Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

halth, transplants etc..

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I agree with Sri Gopaul Lakshmanan <visnu_sri that this is a timely

topic, and we would all benefit from discussing it well.

 

As a religion, we are quite specific about the exchange of what have been called

'coded substances' in indological literature : food, body fluids etc., to the

extent of regulating the exchange of these. Thus, proscriptions against

'theettu's and 'asesham's of various sorts etc. have some shastric arguments

behind them.

 

This being the case, I'm not sure organ transplants are acceptable, if one hews

to these shastras. I'm sure we have all heard anecdotes about orthodox

Vaishnavas who have refused allopathic (western) drugs on shastric grounds.

 

Leaving aside the probability of vedic cryogenic surgery, I'm not sure there is

a cut and dried asnwer that says "You shall not receive organ/blood

transfers"...

 

"On the other end of the spectrum, I am deeply disturbed by the fact that lot of

pregnancies are terminated before their term in India (for whatever

reason). If that is acceptable to Hinduism

 

I do believe that the mahabharata refers to specific injunctions against

abortions, referred to as "bhrUNa hatya". 'parihaara' for this may also be

found in some brahmanas.

 

" then I would say transplants and life

support are perfectly O.K. for all.

 

I fail to see this connection. Most of us can agree that the termination of a

pregnancy is a regrettable and difficult reason. Some of us believe that organ

and blood donation are excellent causes. Why should life support be acceptable

if abortion is ?

 

On the grounds that the body is the medium of performance of karma, and that it

should be maintained, I agree that maintaining health is an excellent thing. The

devil, as always, is in the details.

 

Is there an argument from the Sri Vaishnava viewpoint that organ and blood

donation are acceptable and/or to be encouraged, regardless of human origin ?

 

Is there an argument against it ? On what grounds are either of these arguments

supported ?

 

Do we have a position on life support ?

 

In all these questions, I'm looking for an 'ex cathedra' position. I am sure

that we all have personal opinions on these, with reasons to back them up. I

look forward to the discussion.

 

Regards to all,

 

Sundar

 

 

 

 

--------------------

Get free personalized email at http://.iname.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...