Guest guest Posted July 27, 1999 Report Share Posted July 27, 1999 Dear Bhaktas, I humbly thank all those who've written in appreciation of my dumb write-up on the sordid topic of money. I'm always amazed at the kindness of the true scholars. In the absense of any real knowledge, I only base my comments on the emperical evidence and that simple tale where the guru says one who tells the truth is a true Brahmana... I would like to thank Sri.Venkat Nagarajan for that moving tribute to his illustrious grandfather. It's only because Gandhiji's message fell on the ears of such stalwarts as his grandfather (and many in our grandparents' generation) that the dream of India's freedom was realized and we could walk free. Thank you for sharing the Hindu write-up. But with all due respect, if it was in the learning of shaastras that the great man had found that he must not earn as a lawyer and must shun wealth, I'm sure the transition would have happened much sooner in his life, since he was obviously well-versed in the shaastras. But it only happened when he came face-to-face with Gandhiji's message. I've long felt that that was part of the confusion for us. What has been the collective lesson people took from Srivaishnavism and which portion has come from Gandhiism and socialism? Coming as we do from a poor country, is ostentation either right, necessary or attractive? (when it could be buying someone's first meal in days or a shoe for a child walking on a hot pavement etc..). Such questions of conscience based on current affairs must definitely be faced by each one of us, and of course the best teacher for that lesson is Gandhiji. Every one of his quotes on the subject is brilliant and thought-provoking, whether "The first offense is the accumulation of wealth by one person" (in reference to a poor man stealing) or my personal favorite: "The earth has quite enough for everyone's need. Alas, not enough for everyone's greed." Getting back to the shaastras, though, as far as I can see, our worship and adoration of our Lord involves the choicest of objects: Silk, gold, gemstones, sandalwood, silver, camphor, 'muzhangai vazhiyaara' ghee, milk, chariots... Week after week we've had 2 sets of postings running simultaneously. One set fervently appealing to all to shun wealth on the basis of religion, and the other fervently appealing for worldly wealth for religious causes. I just wanted to note that all evidence suggests that Srivaishnavas in their collective wisdom (?) had decided at some earlier point that they would not go only to 'Vedapaatashaala' and ready for a purely spiritual life, but would take their place in 'lowkika' affairs. Once decided and obviously on this path, to what purpose is guilt or pious lectures to others? Transfer of karma? Of coure it's Kali Yugam and we run the risk of imagining that this is 'real wealth' and 'real power' and then PerumaL gives a lesson or two. Just last week's event surrounding JFK Jr. must have reminded many of Sankara's words: "maa kuru Dhana Jana Yowvana garvam, harathi nimeshaa kaala sarvam..". That young man had all the worldly wealth and highest 'connections'. Didn't do him a jot of good when the call came, and all was over in less than a 'Nimisham'. In fact in an eerie way that makes one wonder about the 'transfer of karma', the family patriarch was told about the certainty of the results of the accident exactly on the anniversary of the day many years ago when he left a young girl to drown (under suspicious circumstances) and walked away.. It's a sad loss for the near and dear, and one does feel for all involved, but these are events, when the US vessels search at the bottom of the ocean for days on end while the 'powerful' wait helplessly, that make us note how far our 'wealth' will go and realize our limits vs His Limitless Power. So I think it's like the boardgame Trade or Monopoly, it's ok to play as long as you always remember that when you joined the game you were a pauper, you may own Kanpur or Chicago now, but when Mother or Father calls you, well, back goes everything in the box, you leave with nothing, and then someone else may come, 'own' houses and charge rent. There have been so many postings now about $s, whether appeals or viewpoints, on what is really our "Bhakti" list, that to atone for my contribution to the same, I wanted to go back to a little village called Gokulam where some innocent village-maidens were doing their darnedest to keep the Lord from stealing their 'wealth'. So there's this Gopi who returns from the well to find her house broken into. Signs of an intruder are everywhere, and strange sounds are emanating from the kitchen. She tiptoes in, and what should she see but a little boy, holding the butter-pot steady with his dimpled knee and his greasy left hand while the right hand is busy stuffing as much butter as possible into his rose-bud mouth. The Gopi stands frozen for a moment, lost in the Beauty of the Face. (If you've seen a human child's face lost in concentration while putting a puzzle together or whatever, you can only imagine how much more Charming our little Butter-Thief must have been...). Then she remembers her hours of labour to get the butter, and she rushes forward, catching the pudgy hand on its way once more with a handful of butter. "Who're you?", she asks. Now KrishNa always knew what to say. If it was His gullible mother, He would talk about how innocent she was, she believed all these lies these other women were telling her. Unh, why would He steal, didn't His dear mother feed Him enough? When He stood accused, of course, the name Balarama was never far from His lips. Also, there's an opportunity to make this Gopi feel small, that she doesn't even know this famous character in the village... "Oh, I'm Balarama's little brother KrishNa..don't you know me?" The unspoken implication in mentioning Balarama is that He may be a little rogue, but the older brother's certainly a bigger rogue, or that Balarama's the leader of the gang, KrishNa's just his little brother... In the teleserial "KrishNa", He says to Balarama "Chhote ho ki bade ho, bhaiya, pachtaoge zaroor.." (You may be my younger or elder brother, but you will not escape trouble..and live to regret it...) "Oh", says the Gopi, "but what are you doing in my house?" The little crook is thinking fast...Yeah, what Am I doing in her house....?..oh, oh, I know,... "Why, I thought it was my house, and so I came in." He's very pleased with himself. He's looking up at her through those long curly lashes to see how well she has swallowed the tale... But the Gopi knows better. "Oh,really", she says, "and why is your hand inside the butter-pot?" (By now, her original anger has turned into much amusement and curiosity to know how He might answer this one..) But our Lord is not yet old enough to know what's plausible and what's not ('poy sonnaalum porundha sollaNum..')..."Oh, oh", He invents quickly, "My calf got lost, you see, and I thought I saw it jump into the butter-pot, I was just trying to take it out..." At this point, of course, the poor Gopi can't control her laughter anymore and she hugs the Beautiful Child to her heart as she dissolves in mirth... How Rich they were, those Gopikas of Gokulam... (A free-form picturization of a shloka from the Srimad Bhagawatham..) Nandakumara, navaneetha chora, RadheGovindha! Vrindavana Chandra AnaaTha naaTha Dheena-banDho, RadheGovindha!! Sarvam Sri KrishNarpaNamastu.. Viji Raghunathan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.