re:Sri Narayaneeyam-99th dasakam,10th slokam

[Guest guest]

Sri Lakshminrisimha Parabrahmane Namaha

Sri Ramanujaya Namaha

 

Dear V.Sadagopan,

Namo Narayana.

 

-"Your question about what this post is doing in

Bhakthi listing is a pompous query as far as I am concerned."

 

You have to forgive me, but I fail to see what is so pompous in asking

whether something which seems to (according to my limited knowledge)

totally contradict Sri Ramanuja's teachings is doing on a forum

discussing his teachings.

 

-"Regarding your offensive and impersonal question ,

whether I am a VisishtAdvaithin or Advaithin ,

I do not need to answer your question in its current form .It lacks

humility."

 

Sorry if my question was misunderstood. I wanted to ask if the author

of Narayaneeyam was a vishishtadvaitin. I have no intention to dig into

personal beliefs of members of this respected forum.

 

Sorry for my bad choice of words...

 

Kristijan

 

 

 

 

Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.

[Guest guest]

On reading the correspondence on the above subject it

seems to me that Sri Vesel was enquiring about the

beliefs of Sri Bhattadri and not of Sri Sadagopan.

And his doubt certainly seems to have some basis ,in

my humble opinion.Nobody can deny that Narayaneeyam

which is a condensation of Sri Bhagavatham is the

outpourings of a great Krishna Bhakta.But all Krishna

Bhaktas do not accept all the basic teachings of

Swami Emberumanar.For one thing in Sri Visishtadvaita

canon the basic puranic text is Sri Vishnu Puranam

and not Sri Bhagavatam.The reason again for that is

that our Supreme Lord is not a brahmachari Narayana

but Sriyah Pati.Without that conviction the greatest

of Bhaktas would still not be a Visishtadvaitin.

 

Emberumanar Tiruvadigale Saranam!

adiyen

BHARAT