Guest guest Posted September 2, 1999 Report Share Posted September 2, 1999 jagat-prasuuti-sthiti-naSa hetave namaH | The ongoing discussion about the concept of RADHA is very illuminating indeed. RukmiNi is an avataara of saakshaat SriH. We also say * rukmiNii satyabhaamaabhyaam sahitam kR'SNam aaSraye *. Can somebody explain the Satyabhaamaa concept and how she is given equal status with RukmiNi as a consort of KR'SNa. With my humble praNaams at the feet of all bhaagavata SiromaNi-s on this list -- V.M.Sundaram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 1999 Report Share Posted September 5, 1999 I am grateful for the information that Satysbhaamaa is considered a avataara of Bhuumaa devi. . Is there any reference to her in puraaNas other than Srimad Bhaagavatam, or in tamil prabhandams? "Madhavakkannan, Vasudevan" wrote: > > Sri: > > Dear Sri Venkataraman, > > I was told in an upanyasam by Sri Krishna Premi that SathyabhAmA is an > avtaar of BhumA Devi. > > Narayana Narayana > > > > Venkataraman [sMTP:venkataraman] > > Thursday, September 02, 1999 10:34 PM > > bhakti > > Satyabhaamaa > > > > jagat-prasuuti-sthiti-naSa hetave namaH | > > > > The ongoing discussion about the concept of RADHA is very > > illuminating indeed. > > > > RukmiNi is an avataara of saakshaat SriH. We also say * rukmiNii > > satyabhaamaabhyaam sahitam kR'SNam aaSraye *. Can somebody explain > > the Satyabhaamaa concept and how she is given equal status with > > RukmiNi as a consort of KR'SNa. > > > > With my humble praNaams at the feet of all bhaagavata SiromaNi-s on > > this list > > > > -- V.M.Sundaram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 1999 Report Share Posted September 6, 1999 Dear Sri Venkataraman : At 04:15 PM 9/5/99 +0800, you wrote: >I am grateful for the information that Satysbhaamaa is >considered an avataara of Bhuumaa devi.Is there any reference to her in puraaNas other than Srimad >Bhaagavatam, or in tamil prabhandams? The largest set of references related to SatyabhAmA are in Srimadh Bhaagavatham. Here is one outside the PurANAs : KrishNa Upanishad distinct from GopAla Uttara Taapini Upanishad gives the connection of KrishNA to the people associated with Him , which is some what interesting & imaginative allegory : " Transcendent Knowledge was His adoptive mother, YasOdhA; PraNavam was His mother, Devaki ;The sacred verses of the scriptures were the cows and the cowherdesses;BrahmA became His staff used for grazing cows ; RudrA was His flute; the Rishis were thre trees ;AdhisEshA became BalarAmA;the 16,108 maidens (who played the game of Love with Him ) are the verses of the scripture which describe the nature of His immensity; Kindness became RohiNi(the Mother of BalarAmA); peace of mind was KuchElA;Truth ws Akrura; self-control was Uddhava; SATYABHAMAA WAS THE EARTH GODDESS , BHUMI DEVI . The references to SatyabhAmA in Srimadh BhAgavatham are at the following sections: Canto I.9.25-30: Marriage to SatyabhAmA and bringing the PaarijAthA tree to Dhwaaraka for her . Canto I.26.32-37: "Conceited " SatyabhAmA being unable to resist the charms of the Lord . Canto X.56.33-45 : Marriage of SathyabhAmA to KrishNA Canto X.59.9-10 : Slaying ofNarakAsura in SatyabhAmA's company. Canto X.59.39-40: PaarijAthA Tree abharaNam for SathyabhAmA Canto X.61:Ten sons of SathyabhAmA Canto X.83: Droupathi's Question to SatyabhAmA. These are the places , where SatyabhAmA as the consort of Sri KrishNA is mentioned in Srimadh BhAgavatham. V.Sadagopan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.