UpadEsa Rathna Maalai: Part10(AvathAra Sthalams of AzhwArs:30-33)

[Guest guest]

SrI:

SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha

SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN-

SatakOpa SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha

 

Dear SrI Sadagopan,

namO nArAyaNA.

 

---------------------

You wrote :

 

It appears that in the time of MM , there was a controversy

about including RaamAnuja NooranthAdhi in the count of

Four Thousand.Responding to this dilemma , MM's disciple,

AppiLLai came up with a count of 4000 without

the inclusion of AmudhanAr's prabhandham . MM however

ruled that the centum devoted to his dear AchArya

RaamAnujA should be part of the 4000 count and

followed the adhyayana niyamam for this prabhandham

in line with the practise for the other Prabhandhams .

-------------------

 

As far as adiyEn's knowledge goes, thennAchArya

sampradAyam counts the 4000 pAsurams, without the

inclusion of SrI amudhanAr's "rAmAnuja nootrandAdi".

 

But, adiyEn knows for sure that the vadagalai-AchArya

sampradAyam counts the 4000 pAsurams with its inclusion.

 

adiyEn requests for clarification in this issue, with

respect to the count recognized by thennAchArya sampradAyam.

thanks in advance.

 

adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan

ananthapadmanAbha dAsan

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Anand: Thanks very much for your note.

By copy of this note I am requesting Sriman

T.A.Varadhan and others , who may be more familiar

with the ThennAchArya SampradhAyam to provide

additional appropriate information to

help us understand the count of 4,000 .

It will be helpful to know more about this.

V.Sadagopan

 

At 08:05 PM 11/11/99 +0530, you wrote:

>SrI:

>SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha

>SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN-

>SatakOpa SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha

>

> Dear SrI Sadagopan,

> namO nArAyaNA.

>

>---------------------

> You wrote :

>

>It appears that in the time of MM , there was a controversy

>about including RaamAnuja NooranthAdhi in the count of

>Four Thousand.Responding to this dilemma , MM's disciple,

>AppiLLai came up with a count of 4000 without

>the inclusion of AmudhanAr's prabhandham . MM however

>ruled that the centum devoted to his dear AchArya

>RaamAnujA should be part of the 4000 count and

>followed the adhyayana niyamam for this prabhandham

>in line with the practise for the other Prabhandhams .

>-------------------

>

> As far as adiyEn's knowledge goes, thennAchArya

> sampradAyam counts the 4000 pAsurams, without the

> inclusion of SrI amudhanAr's "rAmAnuja nootrandAdi".

>

> But, adiyEn knows for sure that the vadagalai-AchArya

> sampradAyam counts the 4000 pAsurams with its inclusion.

>

> adiyEn requests for clarification in this issue, with

> respect to the count recognized by thennAchArya sampradAyam.

> thanks in advance.

>

> adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan

> ananthapadmanAbha dAsan

>

>