Guest guest Posted December 1, 1999 Report Share Posted December 1, 1999 SrI: SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN- SatakOpa SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESikAya namaha Dear devotees, namO nArAyaNA. There has been some discussion in the recent past regarding the number of times one has to prostrate in front of PerumAL etc. --------------- SrI K.M.Narayanan wrote : Let us first look at Vadaglai sampradayam. Sri.Rmanuja's Sri Vaikuda Gadyam, ends like "Swamin..... Phuna Phuna Pranamya:" He says to the Lord that he prostrates HIM repeatedly. Taking cue from Emperumanar, they have adopted multiple prostrations. ...... Now, Thengalai sampradayam, Why they are prostrating only once? it is said that vibheeshana just once prostrated, Sri.Rama took him in his fort. the elephent called only once 'Adimoolamae'....there you see perumal giving protection. not to negate prahalada's wish, he appeared at ONCE. hence by just making single saranagathi, he gives kadakshama at once. such is His love for us. hence to remind him more and more by prostrating more and more, we have not understood HIS mercy properly and hece multiple prosrtations are not correct.. ---- adiyEn is posting this article, since the position of Vadagalai sampradyam is not brought out completly. Also, adiyEn would like to clarify in this posting, that the remark made above viz. " Those who prostrate multiple number of times haven't properly understood the mercy of PerumAL" is not correct. adiyEn would also write about the line of reasoning used by Vadagalai AchAryas for following their practise. note : It is not that Vibheeshana prostrated only once. His "prapatti" (only once) is the import in that context. ----------------- SrI Mani wrote : > -- Single Prostration > "May the right hand of Lord Ranganatha, which, held > in the abhaya-mudra pose, promises freedom of fear to all, > protect me, as it asks those who have surrendered to > Him to not do it again and again." -- Nyasa Tilaka, sloka 2 > > This is a reference to the pose of Lord Ranganatha in utsava > form as Namperumaal. His hand is held up, in abhaya-mudra, > and Desika imagines this as saying "Stop! A single prapatti > is enough! Don't repeat it!" If we take namaskAram as being > equivalent to prapatti, one could take this bhAvam to mean > that a single namaskAram is enough. --------------- Though the bhAvam is understood, prapatti and prostration can't be equated. Also, thengalai SrI VaishnavAs doesn't end up prostrating only once in their entire lifetime, though these reasonings of SrI Mani and SrI NArAyaNan are taken to represent the position of thennAchAryAs. Also, the same reasoning can be extended to things like, performing SandhyAvandanam with proper mind set only once in one's lifetime is enough, performing thiru aarAdhanam only once for the pleasure of perumAL is enough, single time recitation of Dwaya mantram is enough, single time recitation of divya prabandham is enough etc, since that itself would have immensly pleased PerumAL etc. The bhAvam expressed above has the purport of "highlighting" the great mercy of SrIman nArAyaNa and bhAgavathAs. This doesn't mean that, one has to employ such bhAvams in contradiction to the dictates of sAstrAs, which are the divine commands of SrIman nArAyaNa Himself. SAstrAs dictate us about the do's and don'ts. One should follow the sAstrAs, which are the guide available to us to know as to what is pleasing to PerumAL and what is not. In this context, adiyEn would like to write from the work called "SampradAyasudhA", by the late well known vidvAn SrI U.Ve. MadhurAntakam Thirumalai EecchambAdi - VeerarAghavAchArya swAmi (well known as madhurAntakam swAmi), whose centenary celebration is going to be celebrated under the presidentship of SrImad PoundarIkapuram Andavan. MadhurAntakam Swami quotes the following verse from ParamESwara Samhita, KriyA khANda, mAnasa yAgam adhyAyam : " dvidhA pradakshiNam kuryAt praNAmam ca tathAvidham | na yEka tri panca saptAdi gaNanA vishamam hi yat || " < dvidhA = "even" ie. 2,4,6 etc; tathAvidham = same way ; vishama = Odd; gaNanA = counting; yEka, tri .. : 1,3 ..> This sloka instructs that, praNAmam (prostration) has to be done, in the same counting as how pradakshiNam is done in even numbers and not in odd numbers like one, three, five, seven etc. MadhurAntakam SwAmi has added that, based on this pramAnam, SwAmi dESIkan has made a remark in His "SrI pAncarAtra rakshai". SwAmi dESIkan says that one has to perform praNAmams in even counting, since sAstrAs has not permitted odd counting : "PradakshiNAni praNAmAmca yugmAni kuryAt na yEka, tri, pancasaptAdi gaNanA vishamam hi yat ...". MadhurAntakam swAmi, further quotes from Vankipuratthu nambigaL's (direct disciple of Bhagavad RAmAnuja) kArikai which instruct us to prostrate many a times ie. repeatedly (punaph punaha): "pAdukAgriyE pradAyAgrE praNamyaca punaph punaha" < Repeated prostrations in front of pAdukAs > "tathavA SuprANivasatrANi praNamyaca punaph punaha" < Repeated prostrations after offering pure cloths > "dEvapArSvamupAgamya praNamyaca punaph punaha" < Repeated prostrations in front of PerumAL Sannidi > "SamutthAya tatas tasmai bhUyO bhUyah praNamyaca" "praNamya dandavat bhUmou bhUyO bhUyaha purOharEhE" < Repeated dandavat pranAmas ie. complete praNAmams on the ground > MadhurAntakam SwAmi, also quotes from the VishNu purAnam : " namastasmai namastasmai namastasmai mahAtmaNE", for which, SrI VishNu Chittar alias SrI yengaLAzhwAn ( One of the 74 simhAsanAdipatis appointed by Bhagavad RAmAnuja and AchArya of SrI NadAdUr ammAL) comments in his "vishNu chittIyam", the commentry on SrI VishNu purANam, that this is "aadhArAn namaskAra aavruti" ie. Repetition (aavruti) of namaskArams due to excessive happiness. MadhurAntakam SwAmi also quotes few more pramAnams from sampradAyam. Earlier, SrI Mani wrote the following, which has indeed been quoted by SwAmi. > gOdA tasyai nama idam idaM bhUya EvAstu bhUyaH || > > "... may my repeated namaskArams to Goda forever > increase ..." -- Parasara Bhattar's thaniyan to Tiruppaavai Thus, both in the sAstrAs and in the sampradAyam, it is both instructed and practised to prostrate even number of times, and there is nothing wrong in this practise of Vadagalai SrI VaishnavAs . BhAvam (mental attitude) is certainly extremly important, while prostrating to PerumAL. For that matter, anything concerning bhagavad vishayam (things related to BhagavAn) needs very good bhAvam, pouring out one's love towards PerumAL. But, it is very important to know first of all as to what SrIman nArAyaNa expects out of us (in any activity). He has very mercifully given His divine commands Or what that pleases and displeases Him through the sAstrAs. So, the bhAvam expressed by the jIvAtmAs should be in accordance with His commands. In other words, whatever is enjoined in sAstrAs for us to do, are to be done with bhAvam / sAthvIka tyAgam etc. By doing so, one can't be accussed as if he/she has misunderstood PerumAL's mercy. Infact, they have perfectly understood the thiru uLLam (divine wish) of PerumAL and pleases Him by following His own commands. Once again, adiyEn re-iterates that, this posting is only to answer the remark made on the practise of vadagalai SrI VaishnavAs, as if they haven't properly understood the mercy of PerumAL. There is no doubt that thengalai SrI VaishnavAs should follow their AchAryAs and adiyEn is not against their practise/bhAvam expressed etc. adiyEn only wanted to clarify the position of vadagalai AchAryAs through their line of reasoning and make the pramAnams for that practise be available for interested devotees (ie. whatever vadagalai SrI VaishnavAs practise regarding "prostration" is not something "baseless" and it has pramAnams supported by good logic). SwAmi dESikan thiruvadigaLE SaraNam adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan ananthapadmanAbha dAsan krishNArpaNam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.