Guest guest Posted March 8, 2000 Report Share Posted March 8, 2000 Mani, Reading through Sri.KrishnamAchAri's posts again on the archives on aagamA I came across this passage which also seems to suggest that it is not a wholly settled matter that the aagamA-s owe their origin to, or perhaps were part even of the Vedas: Quote: "...In the historical evolution of the Agama-s, there have been several =views over time - a) Agama-s are derived from the veda, b) Agama and =veda are both derived from a common root or mUla-veda, c) Agama-s are =inferior to, and less authoritative than the veda, and d) Agama-s are =superior to veda. It was probably these kinds of differences that led =to Sri YamunacArya's work titled Agama-prAmANya and Sri VedAnta =desika's work titled SrI pAncarAtra rakshA." Unquote Perhaps you or any other scholar-member on the list can clarify the above statement. Thanks, dAsan, Sampathkumaran Talk to your friends online with Messenger. http://im. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.