Guest guest Posted April 14, 2000 Report Share Posted April 14, 2000 Dear bhagavatas, This dasa's name is sridhar ranganatha. Adiyen is new to this group as well as to Srivaishnavism. Adiyen used to believe in Advaita philosophy. It is adiyen's Bhagyam that adiyen is part of this group. Adiyen is very greatful to Sri Dileepan Parthasarathy for initiating adiyen into Srivaishnava philosophy and to this group. It has been a great joy to read such enlightining mails for the last month. Adiyen thanks Sri Karalapakkam for removing his ignorance about samasrayanam. Can anyone ( Sri Karalapakkam) please eloberate on why 'Anaya Devata aradhana' should not be practised by a Shrivaishnava eventhough One may SURRENDER the fruits of any such pooja at the feet of Sriman Narayana, the Supreme Lord. Adiyen regularly performs Satyanarayana pooja here in Minneapolis as a Duty and for the benefit of the community. Sriman Narayana in the form of Satyanaraya has been merciful to adiyen in giving an opportuniy to perform his pooja every Poornima. Adiyen does this pooja with NO EXPECTATIONS OF FRUITS, but does it as a DUTY for the pleasure of Narayana. Also in this commmunity there is no(south indian) temple and very few people know to chant vedas and do poojas. Adiyen tries to serve the Lord by trying to help the community to atleast focus on Lord instead of wasting their precious human life on irrelevant things. Also Satyanarayana puja seems to capture the imagination of the people (may be due to kama, who is adiyen to judge!). So with this background, the Question to bhagavatas is, Isn't it important for adiyen to follow Sruti in the performance of the Satyanarayana pooja? This may involve anyadevata aradhana like Navagraha pooja prior to Styanarayana pooja. Adiyen fully understands that Sriman Narayan is Sarvam, but doesn't want to knowingly violate the procedure of the pooja. Adiyen does this pooja focusing on Sriman Narayana and stresses on the SURRENDER aspect of the katha as advised by Sri Dileepan Parthasarathy. The question is, Should adiyen abandon the pooja because it involves anyadevata worship thereby denying an opportunity for people to experience Lord in the form of Satyanarayana or violate the Sruti by changing the Procedure for the pooja? Actually Adiyen was teaching Rudram, but has given that up on the advise of Sri Parthasarathy and orders of Sriman Narayana. Adiyen is deeply indebted to Sri Parthasarathy. Adiyen begs forgiveness for asking funda questions. Om namo nArAyanaya dasa sridhar ranganatha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2000 Report Share Posted April 14, 2000 [Krishna Kalale] Sri Sridhar wrote: Actually Adiyen was teaching Rudram, but has given that up on the advise of .............. [Krishna Kalale] Dear sridhar, I will not go into the other questions you have posed and I will leave it to knowledgeable people on the net. I think one should learn "Rudram" as a part of "vedadhyayana" or learning other suktas and mantras. From the Visistadvaitic perspective "Rudram" refers to Rudra's antaryami who is srimannarayana. In fact a portion of Rudram is recited in shraddha karma by all. I have noticed that many " srivaishnavas dont know rudram and keep MUM when they are supposed to chant it. If you are teaching other mantras also to others, then in addition, if you teach rudram it is fine. One should learn rudram also in addition to other parts of vedas. We should keep in our mind that it refers to the antaryami of Rudra. That's all. Vedadhyayanam is some thing many people have forgotten. It is one of the important duties of anyone with an "yajnopavita".. adiyen Krishna Kalale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2000 Report Share Posted April 14, 2000 Dear sridhar ranganatha, You wrote: > Adiyen was teaching Rudram, > but has given that up on the advise of Sri > Parthasarathy and orders of > Sriman Narayana. Adiyen is deeply indebted to Sri > Parthasarathy. Just my observations. During my father's saSti-abdha-poorthi (60th/61st birthday celebrations), the *entire* yajurveda was recited by very well-known ghana-pAthis, all of whom happened to be srI-vaishNavas, staunch I might add. This event happened for four days since the entire yajurveda consists of 82 prasnas (aSheeti-dwayam). (Actually only 81 were recited, since one prasna belonging to the AraNyaka portion has to be recited outside the house.) Rudram was also recited. There were no exceptions. When I asked a ghana-pAti present there about this, he said that in the Rudram, every rudra padam has specific reference to Lord Lakshmi Nrsimha. So, I think if you are teaching vEdAdhyanam, there should not be any favoritism for certain kinds of verses just because they seem to refer to anya-devata. Learned bhAgawatas may please comment on this. -- adiyen, murali kadambi Send online invitations with Invites. http://invites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.