Guest guest Posted April 14, 2000 Report Share Posted April 14, 2000 There should absolutely be no favoritism when it comes to the Veda. (a) All devatas should be respected and not shunned, and moreover (b) since the Parabrahman is the antaryAmi and the actual purport of every Vedic description, there should be no reason to not recite any section of the Veda with thoughts only of the Parabrahman. Murali wrote: > Rudram was also recited. There were no > exceptions. When I asked a ghana-pAti present there > about this, he said that in the Rudram, every rudra > padam has specific reference to Lord Lakshmi Nrsimha. I have heard this many times but I find difficult to accept. I do not see a *direct* reference to Narasimha in the Rudram. In Sri Rudram, prayers are addressed to "trilocana", "tripurAntaka", etc., all of which I have never seen used to describe Narasimha, but each of which are obvious references to the deity known as Rudra. If anyone has any clear evidence that Sri Rudram refers *directly* to Narasimha, in ways that are demonstrable to an impartial bystander, I would like to see it. adiyen mani ramanuja dasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.