Correction: AntarvyApti and BahirvyApti (Was Doubt)

[Guest guest]

Dear bhAgawatas,

Not surprisingly I have erroneously reversed the

definitions of nArAh ayanam and nArANam ayanam. These

refer respectively to antar-vyApti and bahir-vyApti.

 

Sorry for the confusion.

-- aDiyEn, murali kadambi

> Bahir-vyApti constitutes the supporting aspect

> (AdhAratva) of God. That is, no entity in the

> universe whether aNu or vibhu can EXIST without Him

> (His svarUpa). This is the purport of the

> definition

> of nArAyaNa as nArAh ayanam - All entities (other

> than

> Him) find their abode in Him. So, all entities are

> "inside" Him not physically but as supported

> entities.

>

> Antar-vyApti constitutes the controlling aspect

> (niyantratva) of God. That is, no entity in the

> universe whether aNu or vibhu can FUNCTION

> independent

> of His will (His sankalpa). This is the purport of

> the definition of nArAyaNa as nArANam ayanam - He

> has

> made all entities (other than Himself) His abode.

> So,

> He is "inside" everything not physically but as a

> controlling entity.

 

 

 

 

Kick off your party with Invites.

http://invites./