Guest guest Posted August 10, 2000 Report Share Posted August 10, 2000 Dear Bhagavathas, Sub:Sri Mani Varadarajan's query. Firstly the notional date of Chaturmasya sankalpam was the 16th of July being the full moon day and not the Ekadasi day.Adiyen has been blessed with the good fortune of attending the Acharyas' Sankalpam for nearly three decades and not on one occasion has it ever been performed on an Ekadasi day. The reason why H.H. Srimad Andavan postponed('pushed' appears to be an inelegant word when applied to an Acharya and a Yathi) the obsrevance of this year's Chaturmasya Sankalpam has been clearly explained in the June issue of Sri Ranganatha Paduka and i thought that a person running such a Bhakti list as this would be in receipt of such eminent journals.More so because a reference had been to this journal while debating the points raised on 'Nathopasana'. Sri Shyamsundar Sreenivasan is posting this separately on this list so i am not going to repeat the same points excepting to state these Yathis have the discretion to postpone the date to any one day before the immediately following Panchami day. The reference to H.H.Sri Sri Sri Tridandi Sreeman Narayana Jeer is a rather delicate point, i have already sent a reply to Sri Mani Varadarajan and i hope that he will do the posting as i have not retained or saved the draft of my reply.I realise that this list is established and maintained by him but the subject raised by him is very serious, it refers to our H.H. and another Acharya for whom i have the greatest respect, i hope that he will post my reply as is where is without any abbreviation or editing. Another suggestion to all our Bhagavathas in U.S is that you apply the prefix H.H. whenever and wherever you refer to any of these Yathis of our Sampradaya be it the Ahobila Mutt or the Andavan Asramam or the Parakala Mutt or the Thennacharya Paramapara.Accustomed as you may be in addressing persons by their christian or first names, this maybe a little difficult for you but this is essential. I am sorry if my message is rather blunt but you are all enlightened persons and many of you are well read enough to debate the meanings of our philosophy on the net and the least you can do here is to address these great souls with the prefix H.H. Vasakha doshaha Kshandavyaha !! RR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2000 Report Share Posted August 10, 2000 I thank Sri Shyamsundar and the others who sent me private and public replies concerning my question. As I stated at the outset, I really am just curious about the traditions and purpose behind the cAturmAsya, of which I am quite ignorant. I have no other motives. I thank Sri Shyamsundar for satisfactorily explaining Srimad Andavan Swami's reasons for the postponement of the sankalpa. I was not aware that the cAturmAsya sankalpa is traditionally taken on the paurNami also known as vyAsa or guru pUrNimA. From what I have read in the past, the cAturmAsya period is bracketed by the Sayana and utthAna ekAdASi-s, where Sriman Narayana is said to be in yOga-nidra. My pancAnga has the Sayana ekAdaSi as the beginning the cAturmAsya vrata. Perhaps this is a slightly different notion and does not apply to sannyAsis. If anyone can clarify this, I would greatly appreciate it. Sri RR (eyetex) has sent an informative note to the list in response to my query. He raises some questions to which I feel obligated to reply. Please pardon this mild digression: 1) I unfortunately am not a r to Sri Ranganatha Paduka and hence did not have the chance to read any articles therein which explain the cAturmAsya. 2) When we already have words in our own languages to express appropriate respect, I feel it totally unnecessary to use western titles such as "His Holiness", or "H.H." when referring to the great sannyAsis of our tradition. What do these English titles accomplish that the traditional words "Sri", "Srimad", "Swami", "Jeeyar", etc., do not? 3) I do not edit any article that is sent to the list. Any article that appears has been forwarded as it was sent to me. 4) I did not think I raised a "serious subject" -- I know of nothing strange surrounding this issue. I am not questioning anyone's behavior. I always presume that yativaras of such stature are well aware of the traditions and make decisions in accordance with them. My curiosity lies in my ignorance, not in a decision to question someone else's judgment. aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.