Guest guest Posted August 25, 2000 Report Share Posted August 25, 2000 Sri: SrImathe Gopaladesika mahadesikaya Namah: Dearest Bhagawathas, Thanks to Sri Murali, Sri Seshadri for their abhimanams towards this "seelamilla siRiyOn". It is their greatness that they see goodness in adiyEn's rambling. As pointed out by Sri Mani, neither did I find anything wrong in Smt Shoba's statements/queries. Also, since it was well answered by Sri TV Venkatesh, I did not take it further, when I attempted to answer the other queries in my earlier mail. Smt Shobha, please raise such doubts/concerns, as only that will keep us learning more about our sampradayam. I had heard- read that Emperumaan alone is to be considered as Purushan and all jIvan are sthrees (women). That is the reason adiyEn wrote about committing ourselves (as sthrees) to our PurushOtthaman. I knew committing adultery is shocking; more so, if it to the Greatest PurushOtthaman- who is ever willing to forgive me , in spite of my continuous apacharams every second. "PithEva puthrasya sakEva sakhyu:- "priya priyaarhasi" -dEva sOdum;" I had only extrapolated from AzhwAr's nAyikA Bhavams and longing for Him alone, and Sri AndAL's "maanidvarkku enRu pEcchupadin vaazhagillEn". I am sorry, Sri Mani, if I have spelt out some rahasyam as I was not aware of it. Since Sri Mani is a well read srivaishnavan and is quite a knowledgeable Bhagawatha, it has to be true. Thanks very much, Sri Mani for "thirutthi paNikOLLu"fying (correcting) adiyEn. "avan allaal deivam illai; kaRRinam mEyttha kaNNan kazhal iNai paNimin neerE." Regards Narayana Narayana adiyEn Narayana dAsan Madhavakkannan ______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.