Guest guest Posted October 5, 2000 Report Share Posted October 5, 2000 Hare Krishna !!!!! I must thank His Grace Mani Varadarajan for very wonderfully explaining the position of an Acharya's pastimes. I raised this question to get a better picture of the Alvar's pastimes. I had earlier known of his robbing and using the golden Buddha's gold to erect the temple at Arangam. But I too did not come across any murdering incidents. The tendency is that there are some Tamilian elements who for their own selfish reasons fault the Alvars and Nayanmars for the countless deaths of Jains and Buddhists in Southern India following the revival of the bhakti movement. I expected a clear and powerful defense of the Alvar which I could forward to the poster of the original mail I had sent to this forum and I have gotten it now. I have already written to that list which featured the initial mail and explained the situation. Mani Prabhu's mail is very strong ammunition to combat erroneous opinions. Thank you once again for such a good reply. Hari bol ! Your servant, Harijana kinkaran, R. Jai Simman Singapore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2000 Report Share Posted October 5, 2000 Sri Jai Simman wrote: > The tendency is that there are some Tamilian elements who for their own > selfish reasons fault the Alvars and Nayanmars for the countless deaths of > Jains and Buddhists in Southern India following the revival of the bhakti > movement. I am hesitant to label these as "selfish reasons", when there are good reasons to believe that Jains and Buddhists were persecuted. There is no doubt that there was a great deal of animosity between the Vaishnavas and Saivas on the one hand and Buddhists and Jains on the other during this period. This is obvious from the poetry of Jnana Sambandhar among the Nayanmars and Tondar-adi-podi among the Alvars. Whether these saints were *directly* responsible for the deaths of "countless" Jains and Buddhists is doubtful, but it is plausible that many people were persecuted in the process. What probably happened is that kings took advantage of the religious transition and executed or severely persecuted the leaders of the declining religious movements. The Periya Puranam which documents the lives of the Nayanmars attests to the great animosity against the Jains, even if it may exaggerate the happenings and the numbers. Note that the traditional biographies of the Alvars do not mention any persecution of members of rival faiths at the hands of the saints. The story of Tirumangai Alvar which started this discussion mentioned the killing of fellow bandits, not Buddhists or Jains. aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2000 Report Share Posted October 7, 2000 Hare Krishna. Please accept my humble obeisances. These are my replies to Mani Prabhu's recentmost response to my posting in this regard. > Message: 8 > Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT) > Mani Varadarajan <mani > Re: Digest Number 157 - Thirumangai Alvar >Mani Prabhu wrote " I am hesitant to label these as "selfish reasons", when there are good >reasons to believe that Jains and Buddhists were persecuted. There is > no doubt that there was a great deal of animosity between the Vaishnavas >and Saivas on the one hand and Buddhists and Jains on the other during > this period. This is obvious from the poetry of Jnana Sambandhar among > the Nayanmars and Tondar-adi-podi among the Alvars. Whether these saints > were *directly* responsible for the deaths of "countless" Jains and > Buddhists is doubtful, but it is plausible that many people were persecuted > in the process. What probably happened is that kings took advantage of the > religious transition and executed or severely persecuted the leaders of the > declining religious movements. RJS : It is not the compassion felt for the victims of such alleged persecutions that I labelled as selfish reasons. On the contrary, I am referring to the presently held strands of atheistic thought processes parading within the politics and life of today's Tamil Nadu . These processes utilising their accompanying political leverage have sought to present highly tilted and concocted versions of history and literature in an attempt to fulfil their own "selfish" agendas totally unrelated to the cultivation of Bhagavad-bhakti. To this end they take examples out of their intended context and garb them in an ethnocentric manner. Thus doing, they debunk all spiritual experiences, indicating that these are superstituous and injurious to the concept of human rights and manithaneyam due to their creation of sectarian cleavages, in which one thrives and another is crushed - all this in the name of God Almighty. Such a discourse as the one I originally posted to this list could have been influenced by such tendencies. It is certainly agreed, as you rightly pointed out, that politicians are expert in utilising anything and everything to gain leverage. Religion is no exception. > The Periya Puranam which documents the lives of the Nayanmars attests > to the great animosity against the Jains, even if it may exaggerate the > happenings and the numbers. RJS : Regarding these accounts, is there anything substantial on the fate of the jains defeated by Jnana-sambhandar ? what happened to them ? what did the king do to the jains who attempted to persecute Appar ? or for that matter the Buddhists defeated by Manikkavasagar ? If at all the kings attempted capital punishment, did the saints speak against these ? any signs of discouragement ? In the case of our Alvars, I have yet to find any such massive persecutions being mentioned. What of Sripad Ramanujacarya's conversion of the Hoysala King ? Were the jains persecuted by him upon his conversion to Sri Vaishnavism ? > Note that the traditional biographies of the Alvars do not mention any > persecution of members of rival faiths at the hands of the saints. The > story of Tirumangai Alvar which started this discussion mentioned the > killing of fellow bandits, not Buddhists or Jains. RJS : Point noted and agreed upon. > aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan > Mani Vaishnava dasanu dasan, R. Jai Simman Singapore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.