Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Melkote Ramapriyan& Bibi NaacchiyAr: Some reflections

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Sri Mani Varadarajan:

 

Thanks for sharing excerpts from the scholarly

article of Sri M.R.SampatkumAran (MRS).

 

MahA lakshmi At the ThiruppAdhams of the Lord at Melukote

**********************************************************

There is a small image of MahA Lakshmi ( not Bibi NaacchiyAr)

between the two feet of ThirunArAyaNan . It is " carved "

in stone and is part of the Moolavar ThirumEni. It is of

small in size. You can have the darshanam ,when the Bhattars

do KarpUrArathti.MahA Lakshmi's height comes upto

the ankle aabharaNams of ThirunArAyanan.

 

There is also MahA Lakshmi at the feet of

Uthsava BhEram , Sampath KumArar.Often ,

the Aabharanams and the garlands hide

MahA Lakshmi at the Paadham of Chella PiLlai.

The chihnams are of MahA Lakshmi.

 

The traditional Vire and posisble Way out

******************************************

Sriman A.N.Srinivasa Iyengar in his article

in "Melukote thru ages" edited by Dr.Lakshmi

Tatachar writes in page 33 :

 

" Another important feature observed in Melukote

is the installation of Bibi NaacchiyAr ( princess Sultanate

of Delhi) at the feet of SampathkumAran ".

 

The author then describes the visit of RaamAnujA

to Delhi and the recovery of Raama Priyan ( Selva

PiLlai ) from the harem .

 

Did AchArya RaamAnujA Visit Delhi?

***********************************

 

We must remember that AchArya RamAnujA was 82

years old , when He came to Melukote and

left for Srirangam from there , when He was 94.

The alluded journey must have taken place during

this period. I am not sure that the depth of kaimkaryams

performed by AchArya RaamAnujA at Melukote would have

permitted Him to leave MelukOte for extended periods of

time on a most strenous journey North . He had ofcourse

excellent and competent sishyAs , who supervised a lot

of kaimkaryams .

 

ThirukkulatthAr's and their access to the temple

*************************************************

ThirukkulatthArs helped Him excavate the Mula BhEram

from an ant hill , where He was resting and the special

nmaryAdai for them during BrahmOthsavam might have

originated from that occasion and not because of

help to protect him (AchArya RaamAnujA) during his

trip back with Chella PiLlai.

 

A Moslem Ruler Versus Delhi Sultan

***********************************

 

There was the presence of the Iran based Muslim(Safir? )

dynasty in Deccan before the Delhi SultAnates (?).

I think Naadir Shah and the stolen peacock throne come to my

mind in this context .Here my memory may not be correct.

They did come via the Arabic sea from West as opposed to

the Delhi SultAns , who came from Central Asia.

It is possible like Sri RaamAnujA might have brought back

the idol of "SampathkumAran " from a Muslim ruler of Deccan

rather than from the one at Delhi, who came to power later.

Some one , who is more familiar with the history of

Deccan can help here.

 

AchArya RaamAnujar's vijaya Yaathrai to Poori Jagannath

and Northern sites like Pushkaram might have taken place

as a part of His visit to KashmIr, much earlier than

the twelve years spent at Melukkote.

 

The household ballads at KranatkA celebrate

the story of Bibi NaacchiyAr. We must also place

the time of Tulukka Naacchiyar at Srirangam /UrayUr

in a similar context .

>>From p. 58:>

> [...]

> The story may have this much of historical truth in it --

> that Ramanuja acquired the idol somewhere in the north. The

> revolutionary reform of permitting the Panchamas [untouchables]

> to enter the temple at Melkote for three days during the

> annual Brahmotsava and te honorific name of Tirukkulattar

> (persons of blessed families) given to them clearly point

> to someone like Ramanuja at work, with overriding authority

> in religious and social matters. And the Tirukkulattar owe

> their new privileges to having formed Ramanuja's bodyguard

> when he recovered the idol of Sampatkumara. Later chroniclers

> must have assumed from the conditions in their times that

> Moslem rule must have prevailed in the north even much earlier.

 

 

Hope these points only add more items to ponder.

 

RaamAnuja Daasan ,V.SaTakOpan

 

P.S : I have copied Sriman Alwar , my partner in

the AchArya RaamAnujA CD ROM and a native of

Melukote to comment further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...