Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RE: Srivaishnava lakshNam

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear sri Madhavakannan,

 

Thanks for this article. It sure helps me focus on looking at myself in the

mirror, self criticism and correction.

 

Krishna

 

>From CG.Balaji Thu May 24 04:25:17 2001

Return-Path: <CG.Balaji

Received: (qmail 10997 invoked by uid 7800); 24 May 2001 11:25:16 -0000

X-Sender: CG.Balaji

X-Apparently-bhakti-list

Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 24 May 2001 11:01:54 -0000

Received: (qmail 71615 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 11:01:54 -0000

Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 May 2001

11:01:54 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO goliath.siemens.de) (194.138.37.131) by mta2 with

SMTP; 24 May 2001 11:01:53 -0000

X-Envelope-Sender-Is: CG.Balaji (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)

Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by

goliath.siemens.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4OB1k429179; Thu, 24 May 2001

13:01:47 +0200 (MET DST)

Received: from titanic.blr.spcnl.co.in (titanic.blr.spcnl.co.in

[132.186.64.133]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id

f4OB1fG7026131; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:01:42 +0200 (MEST)

Received: from blrm202e.blr.spcnl.co.in (blrm202e [132.186.64.102]) by

titanic.blr.spcnl.co.in (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA24325; Thu, 24 May 2001

16:23:18 +0530 (IST)

Received: by blrm202e.blr.spcnl.co.in with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

id <KXC6YH7L>; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:36:17 +0530

Message-ID: <6DF78C52E4DB5C438635F110BC0B5AB832A694

"''" <>,

"'bhakti-list'" <bhakti-list>,

"'acharya'" <acharya>,

"'parakalamutt'" <parakalamutt>,

"'srivenugopala'" <srivenugopala>

Srirangam Srimad Andavan Thirunakshatram - Day 4

Thu, 24 May 2001 16:36:16 +0530

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Balaji CG <CG.Balaji

X-eGroups-Approved-By: sgopan via email; 24 May 2001 11:25:16 -0000

 

Swamy Deshikan Thiruvadigale Sharanam !!!

 

RigvEda, Yajur(Krishna and Shukla), Sama, Grantha (Ramayana, Bhagavad

vishaya, SribhAshya...), Paduka Sahasra pArAyaNam continued well into the

fourth day today.

 

After the thiruvArAdhanam, Srimad paramahamsEtyAdi Parakala Swamy arrived at

the ashramam. H.H was recieved with full honours. H.H presented Sri Lakshmi

Hayagrivar's anugraham to Srimad Andavan.

Srimad Parakala Matham Swamy was presented with Sri Venugopalan's anugraham.

It was a divine experience to see both the acharyas blessing the bhAgavatha

goshti at the ashramam.

 

vEdAntha sUri charaNam sharaNam prapadyE !!!

vAzhi vyAkhyAmuddirak kai !!!

>From s.vinjamuri Thu May 24 06:12:12 2001

Return-Path: <s.vinjamuri

Received: (qmail 79002 invoked by uid 7800); 24 May 2001 13:12:11 -0000

X-Sender: s.vinjamuri

X-Apparently-bhakti-list

Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 24 May 2001 12:27:26 -0000

Received: (qmail 23325 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 12:27:25 -0000

Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sriman Madhavakkannan

 

Thank you for a wonderful summary.

 

This one is for daily reading.

 

Adiyen, however is little confused by the following

statement:

-----------------

(5) The only heinous and unpardonable sins which will

nullify the

effects of

Prapatti are:

 

(b) Adherence to deities other than Bhagavan.

------------------

Why would this be a sin?

 

Rudranam Sankaras c'asmi

--Gita 10.23

Certainly it is not efficient. But sin?

May be the poor athma is not ready for prappatti

but does it become sin?

Is it not one's inability to distinguish

and completely contemplate on "purushothama".

 

Furthermore, Sriman Narayana out of infinite

compassion for those of who are fickle

minded and not steadfast, enunciates

the results of worshipping other deities

in Gita 7.20-7.23.

 

Surely, not being singularly contemplative

of Sriman Narayana and not saturating

ones thoughts with Sriman Narayana

is contradictory to "prappatti".

 

But please help me understand why

worship would be prohibited or become sin?

Who is the looser? One who is distracted

or?

 

Thank you

--

Anandavalli Dasan

 

 

 

 

Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices

http://auctions./

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...