Of Kamsa Sisupala and Dantavaktra

[Guest guest]

Regarding the controversy about Sisupala and Dantavaktra, the sons of Krishna's

other Aunt, (one being Pritha the mother of Pandavas) , Sri Malolan Kidambi,

mentioned that he had heard in HH Azhagiya Singar's Upanyasam that the

embodiment of Jaya Vijayas in Sri Krishnavataram were Kamsa and Dantavaktra, I

aver that it could be slip of the tongue or the ear. Because, the two are

Sisupala and Dantavaktra, as I show below with PramaNam.. It does not take a

scholar to dig deep into Srimad Bhagavatam and find out the truth.

After Krishna killed many asuras, they took divine forms and ascended to the

heavens. But only in the case of Sisupala and Dantavaktra, their soul or some

Jyothi or Light entered Krishna in public view of all. This is to show that they

were from Vaikuntha and returned to it after the three births. In the case of

Kamsa no such Jyothi entered Krishna after Kamsa was killed. Please refer to the

following slokas in the 10th Skandha and 74th 78th and 79th sargas. That is

Slokas 10-74-41 to 10-74-46 for Sisupala. Slokas 10-78-37 to 10-79-10 for

Dantavaktra. They are quoted below for reference.

Shira: KshurAnthaChakrEna jahArApatatO ripO:

Shabda: kOlAhalOpyAsIt SisupAlE hatE mahAn.

....ChaidyadEhotthitam JyOthi: VAsudevamupAvisat

PasyatAm sarvabhUtanAm ulkEva bhuvi khAtchyutA...

 

sakhInamapachitim kurvan dantavaktrO rushAbhyagAt

... GadayAbhihitOpyAjau na chachAla yadUdvaha:

KrishNopi tamahan gurvyA kaumOdakya stanAntarE

gadAnirbhinnahrudaya udvaman rudhiram mukhAt

prasArya kEsabAhvanghrIn dharaNyAm nyapatad vyasu:

tata: sUkshmataram JyOthi: KrishnamAvisadadbhutam

pasyatAm sarvabhUtAnAm yathA chaidyavadhE nripa.

 

That is for the relevant portion to prove that Sisupala Dantavaktra pair are the

actual Jaya Vijayas.

 

Adiyen ramanuja dasan

Ramanuja

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

sri:

 

Dear Bhaktas,

 

Yes, I agree with Sri M.N.Ramanuja. It must have been a slip of the ear.

 

Sri M.N.Ramanuja also mentions that:

>This is to show that they were from Vaikuntha and returned to it after the

three births

^^^^^^^^

 

This Vaikuntha is not the same as the eternal abode of Sriman Naarayana.

However the above mentioned vaikuntha should be explicitly refered as karya

vaikuntha. This topic was discussed many times in the bhakti list and this

is a frequenlty asked question.

 

There is an excellent write up in the bhakti list archives about karya

vaikuntham. Please visit:

 

http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/jun2000/0035.html

 

I just wanted to throw some light on this topic of karya vaikuntham since

this is a frequently asked question.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Adiyen ramanuja dAsan,

 

Malolan Cadambi

 

 

_______

 

Get your free @ address at