[Sri NathamunigaL Thirunakshathram ]

[Guest guest]

SrI:

SrImathE Gopaladesika Mahadesikaya namah:

 

Dearest Srivaishnavas,

 

Given below is the correction made by SrI Hari on adiyEn's rambling on SrI

NathamunigaL.

Sorry for the error and thanks to Sriman Hari for thirutthip paNikoLLal.

 

Regards

Narayana Narayana

aDiyEn Narayana dAsan madhavakkannan

---------------------- Forwarded by Madhav Vasudevan/SGLUM/ABB on

07/03/2001 07:49 AM ---------------------------

 

M.S.HARI Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari <mshari

07/03/2001 11:05 AM

 

 

 

 

"Madhavakkannan V" <srivaishnavan, Madhav

Vasudevan/SGLUM/ABB@ABB_SG01

cc: mshari

Re: [sri NathamunigaL Thirunakshathram ]

 

Security Level:? Internal

 

 

 

Dear SrI MAdhavakkaNNan swAmi,

 

I thank you for the good post. But I request you to kindly make

a note of the following mistakes (spelling or typing or memory)

You wrote:

> nAthEna muni nAthEna bhavEyam nathavan ahamam |

The correct version with will lead to proper meaning is

> nAthEna muninA tEna bhavEyam nAthavAn ahamam

(you have repeated nAthEna twice, but after "muni", it is "tEna"

and nathavan & nAthavAn transliteration error)

nAthEna and muninA are in third case (mUndRAm VETRumai uRubu)

You wrote:

>Swamy desikan says:

>Gaanam valampuriyanna naR kaadhal adiyavarkku/

The correct version of the above line is

> kALam valampuri yannanaR kada ladiyavarkkuth

Gaanam is incorrect. kALam is the correct reading. kALam refers

to a musical instrument termed kALaham/gALaham.

Also, when Tamil verses are written, the "Seer" and "taLai"

must be taken care such that it the line is appropriately split.

Also, when quoting swAmi dESika, we need to be very careful

because each word of swAmi is highly packed with ultimate

knowledge and misrepresentation even by slightest mistake

even unintentionally becomes a sensitive issue in many cases.

 

Thanks & Regards

M.S.HARI rAmAnuja dAsan (mshari, mshrd)