A couple of observations reg. your post (latest) reg. thUpul mandapa kanikaryam appeal.

[Guest guest]

SrI:

Dearest Srivaishnavas,

I apologise for the errors. I am glad that people do read the posts:-)

Regards

Narayana Narayana

aDiyEn narayanadAsan madhavakkannan

 

---------------------- Forwarded by Madhav Vasudevan/SGLUM/ABB on

07/30/2001 07:46 AM ---------------------------

 

M.S.HARI Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari <mshari

07/28/2001 06:00 AM

 

 

 

 

Madhav Vasudevan/SGLUM/ABB@ABB_SG01, srivaishnavan

cc: mshari

A couple of observations reg. your post (latest) reg. thUpul

mandapa kanikaryam appeal.

 

Security Level:? Internal

 

 

 

Dear SrI MAdhavakkaNNan swAmi,

 

A couple of observations reg. your post (latest) reg. thUpul

mandapa kanikaryam appeal.

> TattvasikhAmaNi and RahasyasikhAmaNi are the 18th and 19th works,

> the former of which is lost. In the latter work, the Acharya discusses

> the nature of the PurANas and their status as supplements to the Vedas.

 

Rhasya SikAmaNi explains SrI VarAha charama-Slokam.

> Twentyeight of them are given the name of ChiilaRai Rahasyam (minor

> Rahasyas); four are Major Rahaysas namely Atthigiri MahAthmyam,

> Paramapadha Bangam, ParamapadasOpAnam and Rahasyatrayasaram.

 

It is para-mata-bhangam and not paramapadha-Bangam. This is just

a typing error which I think.

 

Thanks & Regards

M.S.HARI rAmAnuja dAsan (mshari)