Guest guest Posted November 26, 2001 Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 Hello everybody, My name is Murali Krishnan. My father is from Kancheepuram & mother from Tirupathi. Though I was born in my mother's place, all my studies and early life were in Chennai, Tamilnadu. Both of my parents love the Lord Krishna and automatically they inspired me to know more about him and the Gita. I have been reading the Gita over and over again (Bhagavad Gita as it is by Swami Prabhupada) and I will do so till the end. I am very happy to have joined this group. Regards MuraliKrishnan GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities./ps/info1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2001 Report Share Posted November 27, 2001 Dear sri Murali Krishnan, If you are so interested in Gita, please pick up a book on Ramanuja Bhasyam. This is the best interpretation possible on Gita. All other interpretations have problems. If possible learn this text under a guru, even if it takes effort to do so. regards, krishna Kashyap krishnan murali [muralikrishnan21] Monday, November 26, 2001 11:20 PM bhakti-list Introduction of myself Hello everybody, My name is Murali Krishnan. My father is from Kancheepuram & mother from Tirupathi. Though I was born in my mother's place, all my studies and early life were in Chennai, Tamilnadu. Both of my parents love the Lord Krishna and automatically they inspired me to know more about him and the Gita. I have been reading the Gita over and over again (Bhagavad Gita as it is by Swami Prabhupada) and I will do so till the end. I am very happy to have joined this group. Regards MuraliKrishnan GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities./ps/info1 ----------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2001 Report Share Posted November 28, 2001 Dear Krishna, Bhagavad Gita As It Is and Ramanuja Bhasya are both excellent piece of commentary. Both are from different Sampradayas of vaishnava. Bhagavad Gita As It Is by Srila Prabupadha is based on Brahma Gaudiya sampradaya while Ramanuja Bhasya is based from Sri Sampradaya. The goal is the same but the philosophy is different. This is my opinion. Bala Beijing. --- Krishna Kashyap <kkalale1 wrote: > Dear sri Murali Krishnan, > If you are so interested in Gita, please pick up a > book on Ramanuja > Bhasyam. This is the best interpretation possible on > Gita. All other > interpretations have problems. If possible learn > this text under a guru, > even if it takes effort to do so. > > regards, > > krishna Kashyap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2001 Report Share Posted November 28, 2001 Dear Bala, I do understand about these two sampradayas. I have been conducting research on Gita for a couple of decades now. I definitely know that I dont know Gita thoroughly. However, I feel that the meanings as indicated in Gaudiya sampradaya, tend to not fit into the verses very well. For example the interpretation of the term atma in first 6 chapters is taken as God / Paramatma in Srila Prabhupada's gita as it is. However it fits the role of jivatma better. This is indicated in the 6th chapter last verse yoginamapi sarvesham madgatenantaratmana shraddhavan bhajate yo mam sa me yuktatamo matah. - which indicates the yogi mentioned hitherto is the one who meditates predominantly for self realization and the highest yogi is the one who meditates on paramatma / Lord Krishna. This becomes clear in the 7th chapter which starts with mayyasakta manah partha yogam yunjam madasraya.... Please do read other bhasyas and even shankara bhasya to get a comparitive view and deeper appreciation of the gita, which according to me, is the best precis of perennial philosophy. regards, krishna Balakrishnan M [balakrsna007] Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:18 PM Krishna Kashyap; krishnan murali; bhakti-list RE: Introduction of myself Dear Krishna, Bhagavad Gita As It Is and Ramanuja Bhasya are both excellent piece of commentary. Both are from different Sampradayas of vaishnava. Bhagavad Gita As It Is by Srila Prabupadha is based on Brahma Gaudiya sampradaya while Ramanuja Bhasya is based from Sri Sampradaya. The goal is the same but the philosophy is different. This is my opinion. Bala Beijing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2001 Report Share Posted November 29, 2001 Dear Krishna, Thank you very for your comments on the commentary about the Gita. It is good to know that you have been conducting research on Gita for decades. The last verse in the 6th Chapter yoginam api sarvesham madgatenantaratmana shraddhavan bhajate yo mam sa me yuktatamo matah actually indicates that of all the yogis, one who is always fixed in devotion or who always remembers and thinks of the lord is the greatest of all not one who meditates predominantly for self realization and the highest yogi is the one who meditates on paramatma / Lord Krishna. The focus is fixed in devotion not astanga yoga. In the 6th Chapter Arjuna rejected the astanga yoga described by Lord Krishna yo yam yogam tvayah prokta samyena madhusudanah......... and then cancalam hi manah krishna pramati balaved dhryam tashayam nigraham manye vayur eva suduskaram ( please check for the right spelling)The yoga that you taught me is impratical and hard to execute as the mond is restless. Lord Krishna concludes the 6th Chapter by saying that of all yogis one who fixes his mind or who thinks and remembers about him is the greatest. In other words thinking and remembering about the Lord is bhakti. Prahlad Maharaja defines bhakti as srvanam kirtanam visnu smaranam.......... Bhakti yoga is recommended for this age of kali according to scriptures. krishna also declares that only by devotional service that he will be known. bhaktaya mam abijanati...... after many many births, one who is in knowledge surrenders to me...... bahunam janmanam ante jnavam mam prapayante vasudevam sarvam iti sa mahatma sudhurlubah( please check for the right spelling). Bhagavad Gita as It Is focuses more on Bhakti yoga. I am not an an expert in Gita or religion is not my field of expertise. However over the last few years I have been reading the vedic literatures such as Gita, Srimad Bhagavatham, Mahabaratha and Valmiki Ramayana. At present I am trying to focus on application of the principles of Gita in human resource management and leadership in organisations. Other acaryas in group can participate and give their opinions. We all can learn from one another. Regards Bala Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2001 Report Share Posted November 29, 2001 Dear sri Balakrishnan, You wrote: In the 6th Chapter Arjuna rejected the astanga yoga described by Lord Krishna yo yam yogam tvayah prokta samyena madhusudanah......... and then cancalam hi manah krishna pramati balaved dhryam tashayam nigraham manye vayur eva suduskaram ( please check for the right spelling)The yoga that you taught me is impratical and hard to execute as the mond is restless. ************ My views I dont think the issue at hand is answered in your email ie.: "first 6 chapters do not focus on God but jeevatma.- as per Sri Ramanuja. This is not so according to all dvaita / gaudiya commentaries. I feel that Sri Ramanuja's views are more appropriate and can be validated by assessment of Gita's original words. Clearly, the first 6 chapters focus only on jivatma. Other commentaries do not explain the free flow of gradual yoga which is so well explained by Sri Ramanuja . Unfortunately this work is the least marketed Gita bhasya!. Unless one spends a lot of time understanding the major bhasyas of Advaita, Visistadvaita, Dvaita, a good understanding of gita is not possible. Hence, please go thru the other bhasyas also, since you have so much interest in Gita. The other bhasyas of dvaita/gaudiya are good books for devotees to read. However, they can confuse the readers' mind. One should go beyond this confusion. Since confusion is the beginning of learning. Of course for those who are not familiar with sanskrit, it may be tough to follow what I am referring to and even analyse the differences in these bhasyas. However, I do thank the hare krishnas whole heartedly to have published gita worldwide. I am a frequent visitor to ISKON temples and I do participate in their events. I really feel that they have great devotion. However, Gita is an art; One has to go beyond and study different views to perceive its beauty. By the way Sri Sankara's work on Gita is very consistent eventhough a couple is issues such as nirguna bramhavada and mayavada cannot be well supported in the Gita. By the way, Email is not a good medium to learn shastras such as gita. One has to learn it under a guru. One should complement guru's teachings by book reading. Again, let me state clearly that I do not claim to understand most of gita after working on it seriously for 20 years. Such is the greatness and power of the words of Lord Sri Krishna. All glories to him and bhagavatas. Ramanuja bhasya : is available in international vivekananda or ramakrishna missions world wide - authors : SS Raghavachar, Adidevananda, MR sampathkumaran ( may be available in other book stores), Wait for book from SMS Chari!!! this will be an eye opener. (title - comparitive Estimate of Commentaries on Gita ; by Samkara, Ramanuja & Madhva. Of course if you know kannada, book by Dr. NS Anantha Rangachar is excellent ( it has 3 volumes and is available in India bangalore - phone 91-80-3383755 ******************** Regards, adiyen Krishna Kashyap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.