Guest guest Posted February 8, 2002 Report Share Posted February 8, 2002 Dear Kumari Kalaivani et al, When I started to read Kalaivani's explanation on the color "green" for Krishna, I wondered if you were heading in the right direction because, Radhe per se is not considered as "Piratti" or Thaayar in toto among Sri Vaishnava Acharyas. It is Rukmini, the officially wedded wife of Sri Krishna who is considered the manifestation of Thaayar. All other feminine forms attracted to Krishna were either Amshams of thaayar or Gopikaas(reembodiment of Vaanaras from the Ramayana times --there's a sperate story to that). But I must admit I was bowled over by your deduction of color schemes. It was pure Bhakthi, intense anubhavam and a very constructive use of logic. Really good to see some variety in Anubhavams among the youth today. ||Rukmini SamEtha sri Venugopala swAminE namaha|| Thu, 07 Feb 2002 23:04:56 +0000 "kalaivani retnavellu" <kalaivani4krishna Re: Question related to SrI vishNu sahsranAmam write-up. radhe govinda namo narayana hari hari .... >so it is adiyal's humble guess that bhagavan too indulged in a bit of >painting. )) > >ergo, if we take radhe krishna in a small math/paint equation, we would >have them like this :-- > >krishna (blue) + radha (yellow)= hari (green) _______________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.