Guest guest Posted February 13, 2002 Report Share Posted February 13, 2002 Dear Sri Malolan Cadambi I have read with great interest your arguments seperating Radha from Mahalakshmi (Rukmini). I definitely agree with you that Radha is not the awatar of Lakshmi and Radha can no where be compared to Rukmini. Being a Madhwa Brahmin I share your views. But if Smt. Kalaivani sees Rukmini in Radha, and hence finds her to be beautifull, please let her go ahead, I feel there is nothing wrong in this. But by and large Radha is more popularly heard of being associated with Sri Krishna especially in the North India. Even people from ISKCON give more importance to Radha then Rukmini. Eventhough I donot fully agree with the ideology of ISKCON, I have lot of respect for there achievements in promoting Bhagawad Gita and Bhagawatham in the western countries. I have great respect for Srilila Prabhupada, who single handedly spread Krishna devotion in the Western countries. Eventoday the followers of ISKCON donot shy in wearing traditional Indian dress, they shave there heads and have Shika, and put Gopi Chandanam. How great these people are. Eventhough I donot follow Sri Sankaracharya, I have great respect for him. He was a great Saint who arrested the growth of Buddhism and preached the Supremacy of Vedas. Please correct me if I am wrong . Somewhere you have mentioned Dwaitas donot consider Krishna as God head. I beg to differ from you on this. Dwaitas definitely consider Sri Krishna as an Avatar of Sri Narayan and also without any doubt the God ahead. I sincerely feel we should always see good things in other faiths. Kindly execuse me if I am wrong somewhere. Pranams Sri KrishnArpana Mastu NS Gururaj Send FREE Valentine eCards with Greetings! http://greetings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.