Guest guest Posted February 25, 2002 Report Share Posted February 25, 2002 Dear Sri vaishnava perunthagaiyeer, Yesterday I was surfing the T.V for the serial "Srikrishna" produced by Sri Ramanand sagar. Though it is re-telecast, I was viewing the same seriously as though watching for first time. Yesterday's episode I presume is a prelude to Raasa leela. The high light of it is- the lord Sri krishna admits to raadhaa "yes dear I am defeated". How the episode ran is like this. Radha dresses like krishna and srikrishna comes in the dress of raadhaa. Then each look at the other to check whether it suits. Now the dialogue starts. [please understand raadha means krishna and vice versa] Raadha: hey dear how I look? Krishna: dear you look great with all that feminize of raadha --- Raadha: but your incomplete sentence tells me something more Krishna: yes, you are like raadha but that glow of love of raadha to her lord is missing in your eyes. Your eyes are more bland. Radha is foxed by this and unable to answer this. Meanwhile the scene changes to Sri vaikuntam where naaraayanan asks lakshmi have you heard what krishna [raadha in krishna's garb] said. This dialogue between raadhaa and krishna plus naarayanan and lakshmi are keenly watched by sivan, naaradhan, and rishi ganaas from their places. Lakshmi to her lord- Yes my swamy- you are not able to express the love of raadhaa, Lord: hey, love! What is love? - it is all play of my maaya which you call as love and wants an expression for that. How one can do it? Then goes a long dialogue between lakshmi and naarayanan saying like the swapnam is sathyam and the experience of swapnam etc love of raadha is also true etc giving full justification, arguments and counter arguments. But that is all gone in the mind of MGV for he was completely foxed by the following sentence- Lord to his consort lakshmi - which also means krishna to raadha [not the exchanged ones but real krishna and raadhaa] dear, yes I am defeated, I am unable to express the love which you show in your eyes, I am unable to even imitate that love which you show in your eyes. Krishna's easy surrender to raadhaa accepting his defeat- for the lord who has done such marvelous feats like sakatasura vadham, govardhana giri, kaliya mardhanam etc is in a simple affair - unable to show that love. oh krishna - what is this gunam of you to name it if it can be named so. Before that pure love of your bhakthaas you are not able to just imitate, not to show that love, not necessary even to respond by giving that love - you admit your defeat. Dear bhakthaas - live that moment of krishna and raadhaa arguing in front of you and krishna accepting the defeat. Then raadha asks a reward from the defeated- dear please play your flute. Krishna says it will invite trouble. After persuasion by raadhaa he starts playing the flute. Now a group of gopees reach krishna and raadha again with the same or more love in their eyes. Raadhaa gets annoyed. Krishna asks her to have a good look at them- raadhaa sees raadhaa in all gopees- she sees herself in all gopees. Oh what a scene - bhakthaas in their deep bhakti becomes one - no second except the lord- there is no distinction between bhakthas one is more close and another is not so much. a simple fact expressed so beautifully. Dear bhakthaas- now my question is - whether this has a bearing in srimadh bhagavatham or any of the puraanams etc or poorva aachaaryals vyaakhyaanams or is it according to srivaishnava sidhdhaantham. Or is it that the producer has overdone scene this to create the dramatic effect. Even to admit the second half of my question, then also my krishnaa's admission of his defeat in front of his bhakthaas has simply carried me somewhere beyond description. Please live that moment again and again and then describe your feelings. Dhasan Vasudevan m.g. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.