Guest guest Posted March 13, 2002 Report Share Posted March 13, 2002 Varadhan pointed out something interesting. The quote from Srivachana bhUshanam (SVB) "kaN kaaNa nNiRkil aaNaiyittu vilakkuvaar_kaLenRu kaNNukku thORRaathapati" and the inability of our mortal eyes to see his true svaroopam are in different contexts. I meant to phrase them as two different anubhavams for the reasons of perumAL's contemplation. The SVB quote is normally interpreted as describing that if perumAL shows Himself to us, we will, out of our ego/samsaara vaasanai, tell Him to go away vehemently (aaNai ittu..). This is different from our inability to see his true svaroopam. adiyEn, -Viji (Vijay Triplicane) ************************************************************** Why would perumAL hesitate, even a bit, to show his true golden form? As explained in the sri vachana bhUshaNam(*), He is contemplating what form He can take to show Himself to us... If He shows His true viswaroopam, can we, with our mortal eyes, even take a glimpse? (* kaN kaaNa nNiRkil aaNaiyittu vilakkuvaar_kaLenRu kaNNukku thORRaathapati) ************************************************************* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2002 Report Share Posted March 14, 2002 > Why would perumAL hesitate, even a bit, to show his true golden form? > As explained > in the sri vachana bhUshaNam(*), He is contemplating what form He > can take to show Himself to us... If He shows His true viswaroopam, > can we, with our mortal eyes, even take a glimpse? > (* kaN kaaNa nNiRkil aaNaiyittu vilakkuvaar_kaLenRu kaNNukku > thORRaathapati) But why is it that PerumaaL so often *does* hesitate to show himself, even to the Alvars? What game is he playing? I am reminded of one of Nammalvar's paasurams from the "ArAvamutE" patikam of Tiruvaymoli. This has always been a riddle to me, even after reading the commentaries. Here, the Alvar cries out that he can visualize PerumaaL in his mind, he can even feel the subtle presence of the PerumaaL within him, but he is still not satisfied. He wants the external experience of PerumaaL, not just similar to vision, but actual vision: You don't come at all; and then you come as a formless being. Oh, my magician of wondrous forms! Oh, nectar that never satiates! Oh, you who are the sweetness of this slave's heart! You have removed my incurable burden of karma, and You have taken me into your service. O Lord of Tirukkudandai! I am serving you now; Must I still suffer so? vArA aruvAy varum en mAyA mAyA-mUrtiyAy ArAvamutAy aDiyEn Avi akamE tittippAy tIrA vinaigaL tIra ennai ANDAy tirukkuDandai UrAy! unakku ATpaTTum aDiyEn innam uzhalvEnO? (tvm 5.10) In other places the Alvars make it clear that if one has the unbearable thirst for Him, He shows Himself. Why is Nammalvar here denied His grace? ramanuja dasan, Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2002 Report Share Posted March 14, 2002 Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama: Dear Mani, Nice posting on TVM Thirukudanthai pasuram. You wrote, on TVM line 'vArA aruvAy varum en mAyA mAyA-mUrtiyAy' as 'You don't come at all; and then you come as a formless being.' I presume the word 'mAyA-mUrtiyAy' is meant by alwar in terms of 'wonder' , awe' or 'astonishment' and not as 'Formless being' Please clarify. Thanks Regards KM Narayanan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2002 Report Share Posted March 14, 2002 Dear Mani, I am sorry for the impulsive note without research. I presume you translated the word 'aruvAy in to 'formless being'and not the word 'mAyA-mUrtiyAy' In that sense, it is true and correct. Now I wonder, why alwars who get lost and immersed at His 'roopam', Vibhavam' and 'Archarvadaram' should worry about his 'formless being' Sorry again. Thanks Regards KM Narayanan ----- Forwarded by Narayanan K M/TKM_IND on 15/03/2002 08:55 AM ----- Narayanan K M Mani Varadarajan <mani 15/03/2002 cc: bhakti-list 08:07 AM Re: A correction to the posting on 2'nd thiruvandhAdhi (Document link: Narayanan K M) Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama: Dear Mani, Nice posting on TVM Thirukudanthai pasuram. You wrote, on TVM line 'vArA aruvAy varum en mAyA mAyA-mUrtiyAy' as 'You don't come at all; and then you come as a formless being.' I presume the word 'mAyA-mUrtiyAy' is meant by alwar in terms of 'wonder' , awe' or 'astonishment' and not as 'Formless being' Please clarify. Thanks Regards KM Narayanan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2002 Report Share Posted March 15, 2002 Dear Sri Mani, The following is strictly adiyEn's opinion. As such all errors and poor interpretations are also strictly mine. I don't think we can literally take all of our Azhvar's outpourings as their direct experiences. A lot of it has to be taken as messages for us given in a simple, elegant and understandable form. As such we hear them lamenting their separation, enjoying their association, talking about their mortal sufferings, speaking of their joyous ascension to paramapadam, etc. If it were not, as an example, one should be confused by Nammazhvar stating that one needs to be at Tiruvengadam and performing kainkaryam there and yet we know that he never physically went to Tiruvengadam. For most of us who wallow in the karmas of this world, it is a fact that we do not experience Him directly, as a vision or otherwise. Most of us are even incapable of seeing His presence in everything that surrounds us even though we believe that to be true. Azhvar's various messages/experiences apply to all of us at some point or other. The times that he and other bhAgavatas had direct experience of Him is also a message to us, as to what we can aspire to. adiyEn madhurakavi dAsan TCA Venkatesan --- Mani Varadarajan <mani wrote: > > But why is it that PerumaaL so often *does* > hesitate to show himself, > even to the Alvars? What game is he playing? I am > reminded of > one of Nammalvar's paasurams from the "ArAvamutE" > patikam of Tiruvaymoli. > This has always been a riddle to me, even after > reading the > commentaries. Here, the Alvar cries out that he can > visualize > PerumaaL in his mind, he can even feel the subtle > presence > of the PerumaaL within him, but he is still not > satisfied. He wants > the external experience of PerumaaL, not just > similar to vision, > but actual vision: > > > In other places the Alvars make it clear that if one > has > the unbearable thirst for Him, He shows Himself. Why > is > Nammalvar here denied His grace? > > ramanuja dasan, > Mani Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.