Guest guest Posted July 28, 2002 Report Share Posted July 28, 2002 SRIMATHE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA. Dear devotees, Certain interesting questions are addressed by the two mails attached below. # Does the jiva enjoy / possess any freedom to act ( freewill)? Did the lord mean this when He said in BG 18-63 –“yathA echchasi thathA kuru’” –do as per your wish? # Does the ability to know, act and experience confer any freewill to the jiva.? (Sri Ram kumar’s mail) # If brahman resides in all things (both chetana and achetana) and controls them , how can there be free will?( BG –15-15) (avanandri voraNuvum asaiyAthu) # Sri Krishna Kashyap’s mail- God’s problem vs individual’s problem –who is responsible for the jiva’s sorry state of affairs? If it is due to jiva acting on free will, what does the lord imply in BG 16-19? “aham.. aaseerushu yonishu ajasram kshibhaami (the words have been interchanged in order to draw the meaning) # If everything proceeds as per the lord’s designs, does it not amount to pre-determination? Then where is the room for free will? Dear devotees, therefore, may I request you to share your views and your arguments drawing inputs from texts on the question of pre-determination versus freewill. JS >From Sri Krihna Kashyap:- I like some questions since the same questions have bothered me before. This is one of them. Yes jnatrtva, kartrtva and bhoktrtva is given to jiva by God. In that sense, jiva's jnantrtva,kartrtva, bhoktrtva are dependent on God. If it is dependent then one might ask why should jiva suffer due to the stuff given by God? It is not so: the freedom is given to jiva to use the karana kalebara : ie. body mind and intellect as per guidance of shastras. One has the freedom to get bound or get out of it. Once can get into maya or get out of it. if one goes against the shastras it it is not God's problem but individual's. more sins one does, he or she will get into situations and bodies which may have lesser sensitivity to commit more mistakes. >From Sri Ram Kumar, I have a fundmental vedAntic question. According to viSishTAdvaita, one of the key ontological entities is the individual consciouness (jIva) which is a distinct & inseparable attribute of the brahman (the Supreme Being). So, in order to facilitate the jIva's distinctness & freewill, is the ability to know, (gyAtRtva), act (kaRtRtva) and experience (bhOktRtva) accorded to the individual jIva by the brahman? aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan Health - Feel better, live better http://health. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2002 Report Share Posted July 30, 2002 --- jasn sn <jayasartn wrote: > > Certain interesting questions are addressed by the two > mails attached below. Quite an interesting discussion. Whether there exists really free will or not was one of the frequently raised topics in the advaitin list serve as well. From advaita perspective kartRitva, bhoktRitva and j~naatRitva are bhaava-s or notions in the mind of jiivas due to adhyaasa. There are couple of more sloka-s from Geeta that also some bearing on the topics. 1. nahi kaschit kshaNamani jaatu tushTasya karam kRit kaaryate haviashhaH karma sarva prakRitaiH gunaiH|| Thus there is no one who can refrain from perfroming action even a second. On the other hand, 2. prakR^iti eva cha karmaaNi kriyamaanaani sarvashhaH| yaH pasyati tat aatmaanam akartaaram sa pasyati|| - notice sarvaani karamaani - all actions - are being done by prakRiti alone. one who sees that one self (aatmaanam) is a non-doer is the real sear (of the truth) - saH pasyati. 2a Naiva kaschit karomi iti yuktaH manyeta tatva vit - the knower of the truth - tatva vit - has realized properly that I am not the doer of any actions' - giving a meaning that he was never a doer. 3. prakRiteH kriyamaaNaani guNaiH karmaaNi sarvashaH| ahamkaara vimuuDaatmaa kartaaham iti manyate|| again sarvaaNi karmaani - all actions are due to prakRiti alone. only an egotistical deluded jiiva thinks I am the doer of the action - Is action on the part of jiiva notional or actual? In contrast to this- 4. yoginaH karma kurvanti sangham tyaktvaa aatma suddhaye| - the seekers perform the actions without detachment to purify themselves. 5. mayi sarvaaNi karmaaNi sanyaasyaadhyaatma chetasaa| niraashiiH nirmamo bhuutvaa yudhyasva vigatajvaraH| As a part of karma yoga Lard adviases to offer all actions to him and then with mind free from expectatons and delusions - do the fighting - yet actions is recommended from arjuna. One way to interpret all these apparent contradictions is - as long as jiiva has the notions that I am the doer - kartR^itva, bhoktRiva, jnaatRitva bhaava-s then the advice of the Lord is for one to perform with attitude of complete surrender to the Lord - offering everthing including slowly even the notions that he is the doer - since in the final analysis - slokas 2 and 3 reaffirm that it is prakR^iti that does all the actions - Of course prakRiti being jadam cannot do any acion - being antaryaami it is the Lord that is the propeller in the sameway as - mayaa adhyakshena prakRitiH suuyate sa charaacharm- under my direction the prakRiti projects forth all the movable and immovables. I do not know if Krishna Kasyap can get Shreman S.M.S. Chari maama to respond to the questions posed. I for one will be intersted to learn his views. Apparently he has completed his work on Bhagavat Geeta and will be given for publication. Hari OM! Sadananda ===== What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is your gift to Him - Swami Chinmayananda. Health - Feel better, live better http://health. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2002 Report Share Posted July 31, 2002 Sri JS, Please refer to Sri SMS Chary's book titled Fundamentals of VisistAdvaita VedAntA for a detailed explanation regarding all the questions you have raised. Here is my understanding, in brief! # Does the jiva enjoy / possess any freedom to act (freewill)? Did the lord mean this when He said in BG 18-63 yathA echchasi thathA kuru do as per your wish? Yes, the jIvA does possess the freedom to act. Towards the end of His discourse/dialogue, Sri Krishna tells Arjuna to do what he (Arjuna) wishes in accordance with the knowledge provided (by Him) and in keeping with his qualification - referring to Arjuna's duty as a kshatriya/warrior. The Lord offers His advice and leaves the decision-making to Arjuna. By this it is clear that He expects the jIvA/an individual to take the initiative and do the right thing, given the knowledge/qualification, and therefore the implicit recognition of jIvA's freedom. # Does the ability to know, act and experience confer any freewill to the jiva.? (Sri Ram kumars mail) The jIvA is bestowed with knowledge and freedom. Without the freedom to use the knowledge the jIvA would merely be a slave and "initiative" becomes a moot point. # If brahman resides in all things (both chetana and achetana) and controls them , how can there be free will?( BG 15-15) (avanandri voraNuvum asaiyAthu) The concept of God being the antaryAmin or the in-dweller of all things - animate or inanimate - refers to the relationship between the individual souls and the Supreme Being. The Lord's role as a "Creator-Controller" does not preclude jIvA's freewill. He is the cause for the jIvAs/and everything else. The rules are transparent. How and whether the jIvAs want to play it fair is upto them. For the record, the Lord likes those who play fair and prefers their company. [For e.g. if we assume each jIvA as an atom, then freewill and knowledge are sub-atomic particles like electrons and protons, that impart "character/behavior" to the atom. And brahman can be imagined as quark(s) that make-up those sub-atomic particles. So, at the fundamental level, everything is composed of brahman and verily the same. At the electron and proton level too it is pretty much the same. But when it comes to the atoms, an atom of one element is different from an atom of another. An atom of Hydrogen element is different from an atom of Oxygen! And so are jIvAs. Of course, no analogy is perfect]. # Sri Krishna Kashyaps mail- Gods problem vs individuals problem who is responsible for the jivas sorry state of affairs? If it is due to jiva acting on free will, what does the lord imply in BG 16-19? aham.. aaseerushu yonishu ajasram kshibhaami (the words have been interchanged in order to draw the meaning[_1]) The jIvA is responsible. According to the law of karma, we reap what we sow. Good and bad deeds progressively and recursively place the jIvA in appropriate environments. Nonetheless, the jIvA at all times has the ability to choose - to stay and wallow or break-free and soar. While evil acts affect a jIvA negatively pushing it into deeper morass, it does not deprive the jIvA of its ability to know or choose right from wrong. Given that framework, we should use our best judgement / knowledge to live our daily-life. Going by the concept of prapatti or self-surrender, we (must) place our trust in God, and do our *chosen* duty, rest assured we will be delivered. And therefore, we must choose rightly. # If everything proceeds as per the lords designs, does it not amount to pre-determination? Then where is the room for free will? Yes, and No. In the larger context, everything proceeds according to Lord's plan. He has plans for the good and He has plans for the evil. And so things take their own course. But it is the individual's actions that determine the plan he/she gets. The Lord does not *force* a decision. He provides His advice and support if asked for, stands back and lets us choose. Just like He did for Arjuna. >From Sri S.M.S. Chary's book: If it is the will of the God that something should or should not happen regardless of our actions then our effort will become futile or no effort is required on our part. But if it is the will of the God that an effort should be made to achieve a result then there is a need for human effort. ".yat yatnenaiva bhavyam tat...yatnatah bhavati" - Swami Desika's Tattva- muktA-kalApa. At any given point of time, there is no way for us to know God's plan for us. Hence, we have to take the initiative. Thanks, Sriram jasn sn [jayasartn] Monday, July 29, 2002 12:15 AM bhakti-list Re: gyAtRtva, kaRtRva and bhOktRtva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.