Guest guest Posted September 23, 2002 Report Share Posted September 23, 2002 Namaste. Very deep and thought provoking (disturbing!) questions. Amritam does not seem to guarantee immortality beyond a point. Even Ravana is supposed to have had an Amritha Bhandam in his stomach. Vibhishana had to tell Sri Rama about it and ask him to direct Agneyastra (An astra invoked through a Mantra and which produces a fire which normal water can't probably quench?) so that the Pot of nectar is destroyed! This is what I remember from Sri Ramayana. Is it correct? The devotee of Lord may suffer from Ajnana which results in his forgetting his relationship with Rama and Lakshmana in their next incarnations as Krishna and Balarama. Jambavanta fought with Sri Krishna and failing to conquer Him, realised that He is the same Vishnu. So it is Jambavant who had the memory intact. Sri Krishna did not tell him that He is the same Vishnu who incarnated earlier as Rama. Am I correct? While Sri Krishna had the full memory and knowledge of His divine origin, I do not recollect Sri Balarama having that knowledge or memory intact. He behaved like any other powerful person, with special powers no doubt, but not with the memory of his divine origin and his relationship with Sri Vishnu. Like even Arjuna did not have. In Gita, Sri Krishna had to remind Arjuna and educate him about his true self. Right? Having devotion does not always guarantee protection from death. And why should one bother about death, which after all is destruction of the physical body? Even Rama and Krishna had to leave their bodies behind. I know I am not answering questions actually by raising some more questions. But can a story (or even a factual account) be analysed? Why some one in a drama did what they were reported to have done? And finally, what is the question about Marjala Kishora Nyaya with respect to the above? As I understand it, that nyaya simply means that a Prapanna is like a kitten, which has left everything to its mother, i.e. God. Was Dvividha a Prapanna? Respects to all. Swamy SV Note: Though it should be obvious, there is no harm in reiterating that my full name is Swarna.Venkateswara Swamy. Thus Swamy does not denote a monk, sadhu or sanyasi or even an Acharya. Just part of my name. So what I write or ask has no authority whatsoever, except that of my understanding and/or remembering some puranic stories and of course my limited intellect. At 14:52 21/09/02 -0000, Mani's friend wrote: [...] I guess the convoluted point I am trying to make (through all my confusion) is that even Bhakti and kainkaryam dont seem to be enough to stop someone from drifting. The Lord does not seem to come to correct this and we ourselves are powerless to control our senses (which is why we surrender to Him and serve Him). So how can we be saved? The other pricking issue is that if we call it Bhagavat sankalpam - then again it seems to me that the Lord is not really fixed in His resolve - first permitting this guy to drink Amrita (Did He not know how Dwivida would turn out later?) and then disposing him off at a later time. The struggle thru all these paragraphs for me is in trying to figure out the limitations of human endeavour and the extent of the Lord's Grace and what happens to the soul subsequent to service at the Lord's feet - why should he then drift at all? I hope you see that I am not writing any of this from the point of view of idle argument. These are questions relevant to us and about our vigilance on how to guard ourselves against slipping (assuming we are on the right track in the first place). Now how does that fit in with "maarjhaala kishore nyaaya"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2002 Report Share Posted September 26, 2002 1. Vishaksenar: Almost all temples have a vishvaksenar Moorti. He is taken on procession the day before the Hoisting of the Brahmotsava flag to carry out the security scan and security sanitation. And invariably a sannidhi exists for Him. 2. Dwividha's amritaprasanam isdone before their meeting with Sri Rama.Just because he was associated with Him during the Lanka war and even just because he was a bhakta does not give him any immunity from Prarabdhakarma. If a devotee has to escape it, he has to make a specific prapatthi for that. In fact a wise mumkshu doing prapadanam will incorporate a request for such an escape along with. This is evident from even acasual reading of NYASADASAKAM slokas. Desikan desikan _______________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.