SrI vishNu sahasra nAmam - Slokam 77 - Part 3.

[Guest guest]

SrI vishNu sahasra nAmam - Slokam 77 - a-mUrtimAn.

 

 

725. a-mUrtimAn – a) He Who has even the subtle and formless things as His

possessions.

 

b) He Who Forms that are not the result of karma.

 

c) He Who has a disposition that is not hard, inflexible, etc.

 

d) He Who has Forms that are indescribable, and not fixed.

 

e) He Who takes whatever Forms He pleases as His incarnations,

and thus One Who has no fixed forms.

 

 

 

Om a-mUrti-mate namah.

 

 

 

a) SrI BhaTTar interprets the nAma as “He Who owns even the forms which are

a-mUrti’s”, such as earth, fire, water, wind, etc. He gives several references

in support:

 

 

 

bhUmir-Apo’nalo vAyuh kham mano buddhireva ca |

 

ahamkAra itIyam me bhinnA prakRtir-ashTadhA || (gItA 7.4)

 

 

 

“Earth, water, fire, air, ether, manas, buddhi, and ego-sense – thus My PrakRti

is divided eightfold”.

 

 

 

yasya avyaktam SarIram - He Whose body the Unmanifested prakRti

is– subAlopanishad 7.

 

 

 

yasya AtmA SarIram – He Whose body the individual soul is –

Satapata brAh. 14.6.30).

 

 

 

The pANini sutra 5.2.94 says that the affix matup comes after a word in first

case in the sense of “whose it is” – tat asya asti asmin iti matup. Thus, SrI

BhaTTar points out that the interpretation should be “One Who has as His

possession the a-mUrti objects”, and not as “He Who does not have a specific

murti or form”. The latter interpretation will take away the significance and

purpose of the specific use of the matup affix in this case. Thus, according

to SrI BhaTTar, the nAma a-mUrtimAn should not be taken to signify the negation

of a form for BhagavAn. In addition to the matup violation, such an

interpretation will be contrary to the earlier and later nAma-s, such as viSva

mUrtih, mahA mUrtih, dIpta mUrtih, aneka mUrtih, etc.

 

 

 

SrI v.v. rAmAnujan gives references to nammAzhvAr’s tiruvAimozhi, where AzhvAr

refers to emperumAn as aru – meaning One He is formless, as well as of such

complex forms that He cannot be understood:

 

 

 

- puRa aNDattu alagil polinda tiSai pattAua aruvEyO (tiruvAi. 6.9.7) –

You are the (Formless) soul of the countless mukta jIva-s that are in all the

directions of SrIvaikhunTham

 

- tollai nan nUlil Sonna uruvum aruvum nee (tiruvAi. 7.8.10) – You are

the Only One with a beautiful, enjoyable Form, and you are the also the One who

is the abstract, invisible, soul of all things in the world!

 

- OnRalA uruvAi aruvAya nin mAya’ngaL (tiruvAi. 5.10.6)– (I wonder) at

Your wonders – You who has innumerable Forms, as well as One who is the

(Formless) soul of all beings.

 

 

 

SrI rAdhAkRshNa SAstri gives support from the Upanishads expressing that

bhagavAn has as His Form the unmanifested objects as well as the manifested

ones: divyo hyamUrtah (muNDako. 2.2); dve vA va brahmaNo rUpe mUrtam ca a-mUrtam

ca (bRhadA. 3.1).

 

 

 

b) SrI Samkara interprets the nAma as signifying that He has no form brought on

by karma – karma nibandhanA mUrtih asya na vidyata iti a-mUrtimAn.

 

 

 

c) As an extension of the meaning “that which has a form, shape, etc.”, the term

mUrti also stands for “One who is hard, stubborn, etc.) – mUrtih kAThinyam” –

amara koSa. SrI kRshNa datta bhAradvAj uses this meaning for the word mUrti,

and gives the interpretation that because bhagavAn has a disposition that is not

hard, inflexible etc., (krUra, kaThora), He has the nAma a-mUrtimAn.

 

 

 

d) SrI satyadevo vAsishTha gives the interpretation that because bhagavAn has

forms which are indescribable, He is not of a fixed form, and therefore He is

called a-mUrtimAn. SrI cinmayAnanda gives a similar explanation – The limited

alone has a form, but He being Unlimited, like “Space”, has no limited form.

 

 

 

e) The dharma cakram writer comments that bhagavAn takes the forms that He

desires when He takes His incarnations, but He is not constrained in any way by

that form. This is like the lotus leaf that remains in water but is not wetted

by the water, or the fish that lives in mud but is not soiled by the mud. He

takes His forms just for the protection of the good and the destruction of the

bad.

 

 

 

-dAsan kRshNamAcAryan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more

faith.

 

 

 

 

Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more

faith.