Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Dear Sri Vijayarghavan There are no "textual references" I could provide(A Non Sri Vaishnava one) Hoever I am incluing the following 3 URLS and I leave it open to you and others conclude. All these are info provided yy a Non Sri Vaishnava . 1) http://www.hinduismtoday.com/1994/3/1994-3-12.html Remember till around 15th or 16th century no vedanthic scholar knew about any Srikanta and His Baashyams and this same thing came only after advent of Appaya Deekshitha. Neither does any "Khandana" work by Sree Vedantha Desika or Madhava quote or refute or even metion about SreeKanta or talk about Siva Visistadhvaitha. 2) http://www.advaita-vedanta.org/avhp/later.html#app This page says the following >> The inclusivistic and non-sectarian nature of the followers of Sankara is also seen from other customs and texts dating from this period.(Appaya Deekshithaas Period) >>> from which it is obvious that it was during post Appaya Deekshitha period there was a clear and a definative split. 3) http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/s/i/v/Pattamadai-K-Sivaswami/FILE/000\ 1page.html This page gives the following information (This is created an maintained by appaya deekshithaas geneology) >>>>>>>>> PATRONISED BY THE KINGS: Shri. Acharya Dikshita alias Shri. Achhan Dikshita, the grandfather of Shri. Appaya Dikshita, was a great scholar patronised by Krishnadeva Raya, the famous King of Vijayanagar Empire. In order to save a young Vaishnavite girl, named Thotamba from being married to an old man, he had to marry her as his second wife. She bore him a son, namely Rengarajadhwari. He was a symbol of Unity of a Vaishnavite and Saivite family. CATHOLICITY: Shri. Appaya Dikshita was a firm believer in the unity and oneness of God. Yet the age in which he lived made him extol Lord Shiva as the supreme in the Trinity. During 16th century, South India witnessed sectarian disputes between vaishanvism and Saivism, which had taken deep roots during the days of Shri. Appaya Dikshita. Shri. Thathacharya, the Raja Guru of Vijayanagar Empire, did everything in his power to propagate Vaishnavism. It was to project the Saivite point of view and to strengthen its hold that Shri. Appaya Dikshita had to write a series of books like "Sivarkamani Dipika", "Sikharinimala", "Sivatatva Viveka" , "Sivakarnamratha", "Sivamahimakalastuti", "Sivadvaidanirnaya" - all extolling Lord Shiva and Advaita. In these tasks, he received the support and patronage of King Chinna Bomma Nayyakkar. Yet he was not a bigot. He himself says that it was due to the circumstances he had to do so. In a verse he says, " It is not important if Vishnu or Shiva is considered as the Supreme God by the Upanishads; for we belong to the Advaita School. But when men with crooked ideas and narrow outlook proclaim in abusive language their hatred towards Shiva, we cannot keep quite. To refute this , I had to produce these works. This in no way means that I am not a worshipper of Vishnu". That, Shri. Appaya Dikshita was catholic can be seen from the fact that he wrote a commentary on the "Yadavabhyudaya" of Shri. Vedanta Desika, whom he admired very much. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ >>>>>>>>> Please dont miss any sentance in the above pages.. I leave for you to decide if the claims I made could be substantiated or not from the above information. All the above pages give some info about Appayadeekshitha and proof to stong cristisicm made by Sree Vaishnaavaas. Atlast I also am providing you another URL which I will throw open to people in the list to evaluate and conclude. http://home.attbi.com/~surfings/Cogitation/SankaraNarayana.htm I humbly feel all these will give a clear cut answer.. regards Venkataraaghva Dhaasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.