Vali Vadham 41

[Guest guest]

Would Vali have fought Rama?

 

 

Lakshmana told Vali that it was because of the possibility of the latter

surrendering to as well that Rama hid himself behind a tree when he shot the

arrow at him, as otherwise it would come in the way of the fulfilment of the

promise that was made to Sugriva already. This was what we saw yesterday. Was

it possible that Vali would have also surrendered to Rama in case of straight

fight?

 

Well, that sounds possible. Let us think it over. When will a person think of

a 'fight to the last'? He should be convinced about his possibility of a

success. Though no duel is started after discussing, debating and ascertaining

the physical might and the skills of the opponent with weaponry, it is obvious

that it would not start when one party is convinced about the accomplishments of

the other. Vali had very high regards for Rama, for his moral stature as well

as his skills with the bow. It may be recalled here that Tara stopped him when

he jumped up from his bed for an encounter with Sugriva. Tara had warned Vali

that Sugriva has obtained the friendship of Rama and that was why he was bold

enough to challenge him for a duel.

 

The first reaction of Vali was shock. Not that he was shocked that Rama could

have come to kill him. But because Tara, he thought, must have gone mad in thus

speaking ill of Rama. 'What! What are you talking? 'ulaginukku aRathin aaru

elaam izhaithavarkku iyalbu ala iyambi en seidhaai?' Whom do you think you are

talking about? Rama is the one who has shown this world the path of Dharma.

You are speaking things that are not in agreement with his nature.

'pizhaithanai paavi un peNmayaal.' You have uttered slander, you sinner,

because of your feminine qualities. Note the word 'paavi.' That was how Vali

reacted when Tara warned him about Rama.

 

Therefore it goes without saying that Vali had immense regard for Rama.

Number one. Vali was not mentally prepared to fight Rama. Let us assume that

he was challenged for a single combat and then he could not say 'no' because

that is what is ordained for any warrior. He should not go back when a

challenge is thrown to him and because of that he accepts the challenge. His

fight against his opponent can last only till his anger lasts. That was so in

the case of his fight with Mayavi, which lasted for 28 months. But could Vali

have retained his anger for such a long time, especially when he did not have

any hatred for Rama and in fact was devoted to him, admiring him from a

distance? Doubtful.

 

Further, Vali was fully and completely aware of the prowess of Rama. This is

discernible from the remark that he made to Tara. 'nindra pEr ulagu elaam

nerukki nErinum,' Even if all the three worlds (put together) join hands and are

up in arms against him, 'vendri vem silai alaal piRidhu vENdumO?' does he need

the aid of anything else other than his victorious bow? 'than thuNai oruvarum

thannil vEru ilaan.' He doesn't need the help of anyone else. In fact he is

his own aid, his own help and his own assistance. He need not have to be

supported by anyone, in any of his efforts. 'pun thozhil kurangodu puNarum

natpanO?' When this being so, will he, of all the lot, choose to make friends

with a puny monkey?

 

Would Vali, who was so convinced of Rama's valour, prowess and skills, have

chosen to enter into a 'fight unto the last' with Rama when he was so very well

convinced about his strength and skills?

 

Let's continue.