"Such a Rama"

[Guest guest]

Humble pranams to all,

 

i think two different subjects i.e. varnashrama dharma which is based

on classifications of castes in hindu religion … and manava, devata,

rakshasa, which may be classified as jati i.e. different, is

clubbed.. for example… sura, asura, manava, kinnera, kimpurusha,

etc.,these all are various jaatis for which there may be different

dharmas… i do not know but trying to give a logical reasonining….as

stated above, ravana and his group may be classified under group

of "asura jati" instead of "manavas". even if you take the

classification based on the character, since his actions mostly are

of rakshasa like opposing and disbelieving narayana, he can be put in

asura jati..though he was a great devotee of shiva..i doubt there may

be a dharma prescribed for raakshaas too… but i think, lord has

established all dharmas required for manavas, i.e. for us… though i

do not know… let us leave this as it may not be necessary for us to

put light on asura dharmaas… but it is a good question what dharma

they may be following…if you get anytime pls forward it to me for

knowledge sake…

 

to conclude, if pandits and acharya throw a light on whether first of

all ravana and his team falls under manava or Asura then i think we

can discuss on applicability of it.

 

with regard to your query by not taking as "such a rama" but would

like to clarify shortly after rechecking at my end once again on what

basis rama decided to put vibheeshana as a king of lanka. in the

meantime, i request members may contribute your opinion on what basis

rama has decided to promise vibheeshana that he will make as king of

lanka (may not be based on chaturvarna…as i think that is to be

clarified by pundits and acharyas or scholars).

 

Any deviations or misunderstandings of mine may please be corrected

without any second thought for the benefit of Self.

 

jai sriman narayana/GS