Guest guest Posted December 7, 1998 Report Share Posted December 7, 1998 Namaste. Shri Shankara discusses the mahAvAkya "tat tvam asi" in His vAkyavr^tti. I am presently studying this book of 53 verses, which, in my view, explains this mahAvAkya beautifully and to my great delight. In my first-go of this book, it occurred to me that of recognizing or understanding (not intellectually, but beyond intellectual understanding) tat and tvam, tvam understanding and attributing properly is the more difficult one. Do members agree with this ? Regards Gummuluru Murthy ------ Dehendriya manah prANAhamkr^tibhyo vilakshaNah projghitAsheshha shhaDbhAvavikAra stvaM padAbhidah Shri Shankara in vAkyavr^tti Totally distinct from body, senses, mind, prANa, and ego is that which is the SELF; therefore it is absolutely free from the six-modifications, which material things must naturally undergo. This Self is the indicative meaning of the term "thou" (tvam). ------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 1998 Report Share Posted December 7, 1998 Greetings Gummuluru: Thanks for your thoughtful comments on tat tvam asi. The recognition happens when we renounce materialism. For example if we can recognize beauty, happiness and peace without using the materialistic yardstick, we can understand 'tat tvam asi!' This is the true human nature and we can see all beings in our own self and own self in all beings! With this spiritual vision, our intellectual perception of others disappears and we can recognize beauty, happiness and peace without attributes. I believe that any attribute such as "jeevanmukta" neither necessary nor helpful in recognizing tat tvam asi. All that we are capable of explaining is our intellectual (materialistic) understanding! We have to get out of this loop for realizing Brahman! Note: Sanyasi is the one who renounce materialism and we have to be a sanyasi to recognize tat tvam asi! Harih Om -- Ram V. Chandran Burke, VA Gummuluru Murthy <gmurthy wrote > ........, it occurred to me that of recognizing or > understanding (not intellectually, but beyond intellectual understanding) > tat and tvam, tvam understanding and attributing properly is the more > difficult one. > > Do members agree with this ? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 1998 Report Share Posted December 7, 1998 I just wanted share my experience. I read this book "dayamruta geetaa tarangini", lectures on Bhagawat Geeta by Swami Dayananda Saraswati. And fortunately for me it happened to be one of the very first books I read on Advaita almost 10 years back. In his book Swami Dayanandagi explains the concept of "tatvamasi" in a very logical way. And also It is crystal clear. It made a beginner like me understand; and I felt that the concept can't be explained any more easier than this. In my opinion, it drives away any sort of doubt we get regarding the mahavakya. Regards, Madhava > > Gummuluru Murthy [sMTP:gmurthy] > Monday, December 07, 1998 2:46 PM > advaitin > tat and tvaM > > Gummuluru Murthy <gmurthy > > > Namaste. > > Shri Shankara discusses the mahAvAkya "tat tvam asi" in His > vAkyavr^tti. > I am presently studying this book of 53 verses, which, in my view, > explains this mahAvAkya beautifully and to my great delight. In my > first-go of this book, it occurred to me that of recognizing or > understanding (not intellectually, but beyond intellectual > understanding) > tat and tvam, tvam understanding and attributing properly is the more > difficult one. > > Do members agree with this ? > > Regards > Gummuluru Murthy > ---- > -- > Dehendriya manah prANAhamkr^tibhyo vilakshaNah > projghitAsheshha shhaDbhAvavikAra stvaM padAbhidah > Shri Shankara in vAkyavr^tti > Totally distinct from body, senses, mind, prANa, and ego is that which > is the SELF; therefore it is absolutely free from the > six-modifications, > which material things must naturally undergo. This Self is the > indicative meaning of the term "thou" (tvam). > ---- > -- ---- > -- > To from this mailing list, or to change your subscription > to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at and > select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left. > ---- > -- > Discussion of Sankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy, its true meaning, > profundity, richness and beauty with the focus on the non-duality > between mind and matter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 1998 Report Share Posted December 7, 1998 Greetings Gummuluru: The question that you have raised has also been answered by Adi Sankaracharya in Dakshinamurthy Sloka. The enclosed commentaries by Swami Gabhirananda and Swami Chinmayananda conatin the answer in greater details. I want to thank Sridhar for permitting me to post the message to the list members. Let us take this opportunity to welcome Sridhar who has also d to this list. Harih Om. -- Ram V. Chandran Burke, VA HYMN TO SRI DAKSHINAMURTHY of Adi Sankaracharya (Author: Sridhar Pootheri) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ohm. Desirous of Moksha (complete freedom-physical, mental and spiritual), I seek refuge in that self-effulgent One, who projected Brahma at the beginning of creation and revealed the meaning of the Vedas to him, and whose inspiration (alone) turns my understanding towards the Atman. May peace-physical, mental and spiritual-be on us for ever. By Swami Gabhirananda By Swami Chinmayananda 1. The universe is like a city 1. He who experience at the time reflected in a mirror-seen inside of realization his own immutable but really outside of it. And it Self-in which the Self alone plays is again, as in a dream, an inside as the universe of names and forms, phenomenon, appearing outside but like a city seen in a mirror, due really inside. The Truth or Original to the maya power as though is the Supreme Brahman, the one produced outside, as in a dream, without a second. One's Atman is Its to him, the divine teacher, reflection seen through the media Sri Dakshinamurthy, is this of senses, mind and intellect. The prostration. identity of the Supreme Brahman and one's Atman is understood on self- illumination. He by whose grace that illumination comes to me-to that Dakshinamurthy, the Supreme Being, who is embodied in the auspicious and benign Guru, I offer my profound salutation. 2. He in whom this universe, prior 2. He who, like a juggler or a to its projection, was potentially Yogi, unrolls this universe just present like a tree in a seed, and by out of His own free-will-the whom it was wrought to its multiform universe, which before creation by the magic, as it were, of His own remained unmanifest like the will or in the manner of a great Yogi future tree in a seed and has out of His own power-to that later on projected Himself out to Dakshinamurthy, the Supreme Being, be the world of endless variety, embodied in the auspicious and benign due to the delusory play of time Guru, I offer my profound salutation. and space, both products of Maya.... to Him, the divine teacher, Sri Dakshinamurthy, is this prostration. 3. He by whose light the universe, 3. He whose manifestations - which which is unreal, appears as almost are themselves nothing but the real and who graciously teaches the Reality-appear as the objects of truth of Brahman (to the disciples the world; He, who imparts to seeking refuge in him) and who is those who have surrendered to Him, realized through the comprehension direct enlightenment, through the of the meaning of the great Vedic Vedic commandment "That Thou Art", statement Tattvamasi (Thou art That) and after the direct experience of -which realization alone puts an end which there is no more any return to the cycle of Samasara and rebirth to the "ocean" of worldly existence -to that Dakshinamurthy, the Supreme .... to Him, the divine teacher, Being, embodied in the auspicious and Sri Dakshinamurthy, is this benign Guru, I offer my profound prostration. salutation. 4. He whose light gleams through the 4. He, whose intelligence "flashes" senses like the eyes etc., like the outside through the eyes and other light emanating through many holes in sense-organs, just like the bright a pot in which a brilliant lamp is light of a great lamp placed in a kept, He whose knowledge alone brings jar having many holes, and after in the state of knowing characterized whose shining, this whole universe by the awareness 'I know', He whose of "objects" shines ... to Him, the luminosity alone makes everything else divine teacher, Sri Dakshinamurthy, shine after Him-to that Dakshinamurthy, is this prostration. the Supreme Being, embodied in the auspicious and benign Guru, I offer my profound salutation. 5. Vociferous pseudo-philosophers 5. He who removes all the terrible regard the body, life-breath, senses misconceptions, created by the of perception and organs of action, deluding play of Maya- in those, who, fleeting cognitions and total non- intellectually innocent as a woman- existence as 'I' (Atman). Their child-blind-idiot and consider the power of comprehension is comparable reality as their body or their prana to that of women and children, and the or their senses or their ever-changing the blind and the dull-witted. He who intellect or as mere void and through destroys this stupendous delusion error (mis-conception)-declare them to caused by this inscrutable power be the only reality... to Him, the called Maya-to that Dakshinamurthy, divine teacher, Sri Dakshinamurthy, the Supreme Being, embodied in the is this prostration. auspicious and benign Guru, I offer my profound salutation. 6. As the brilliance of the Sun or 6. On folding up all the functions of the Moon exists even when intercepted the senses, He who enters into a by 'Raghu' during eclipse, the power state of deep-sleep and there becomes of cognition remains suspended from existence veiled in Maya, like the the senses and the mind during sleep. Sun or the Moon during eclipse, and The Purusha or the Self exists as the who, on waking, remembers to have pure Being unrecognized through Maya's slept... to Him, the divine teacher, veiling power. On waking he becomes Sri Dakshinamurthy, is this aware that he himself was asleep prostration. earlier. Similarly, the man of realization on waking to the consciousness of the Self (which is pure Being) recognizes it (his previous ignorance) as a past event and an apparent phenomenon. He by whose grace this recognition of the true nature of the Atman comes to me-to that Dakshinamurthy, the Supreme Being, embodied in the benign and auspicious Guru, I offer my profound salutation. 7. He whose existence and reality 7. He, who, through the auspicious shine always and uniformly in various sign of knowledge (Jnanamudra), states (of the body) like infacy reveals to his devotees His own etc., and (of the mind) like waking Self-which persists in all stages etc, and who reveals the highest of age(childhood, boyhood, youth Knowledge of the Atman by the (mere) and old age), in all states (waking, auspicious Jnanamudra - to that dreaming and deep-sleep) and in all Dakshinamurthy, the Supreme Being, other conditions--and who constantly embodied in the auspicious and manifests Himself inwardly as "I"... benign Guru, I offer my profound to Him, the divine teacher, Sri salutation. Dakshinamurthy is the prostration. 8. He by whose power of Maya the 8. He, who is the Purusha, whirled world is experienced during both in Maya, sees, in Himself, the the waking and dream states in all world of cause-effect diversely its variations in the cause-effect related as possessor and possession, relations like master and servent, father and son, and as teacher and teacher and disciple, father and taught, both in the state of waking son-to that Dakshinamurthy, the and of dreaming; ... to Him, the Supreme Being embodied in the divine teacher, Sri Dakshinamurthy, auspicious and benign Guru, I is this prostration. offer my profound salutaion. 9. The moving and non-moving 9. He, whose eight-fold forms are the universe is but (the manifestation "Earth, Water, Fire, Air, Ether, Sun, of) His subtle and unmanifest Moon and Jiva", and who manifests eightfold form, viz. Earth, Water, Himself as this universe of the Fire, Air, Sky, Sun, Moon and the movable and immovable objects-and Jivatman.He by whose grace all these besides which, the Supreme all- manifestations disappear with the pervading Lord, there exists realization 'Nothing exists except nothing to those who reflect well the Supreme Brahman'- to that upon ... to Him, the divine teacher, Dakshinamurthy, the Supreme Being Sri Dakshinamurthy,is this prostration. embodied in the auspicious and benign Guru, I offer my profound salutaion. 10. The all pervasiveness of the 10. The Knowledge "all-this-Atman" Atman is clearly expounded in this (Sarva-Atmatvam) has been explained hymn. By its recital, hearing and in this hymn and so, by hearing it, meditation on its implied meaning, by reflecting and meditating upon the devoted disciple attains to that its meaning and by reciting it, one all-pervasive oneness with It, will attain that divine state, including the unhindered Lordship endued with the glory of the all- over the whole universe, becoming Self-hood, along with the permanent the very essence of the eightfold eigth-fold holy, powers of Godhood. manifestation referred to above (verse 9). He reaches the plentitude of realization and spiritual joy. Epilogue: I bow down to Sri Dakshinamurthy, Lord and Teacher of the three worlds, who dexterously cuts asunder the painful shackles of birth and death, and who is to be meditated upon as sitting beneath a banyan tree and bestowing His grace to Supreme knowledge on the sages. ~~~~~~~~~~~ Glossary : ~~~~~~~~ 1. Atman - General term for Soul. (Jivatman - Soul inside human body; Paramatman - Supreme Atman, also called Brahman) Atman usually means Jivatman. 2. Brahma - Aspect of God responsible for the activity of creation. 3. Dakshinamurthy - Subtle supreme form of Lord Shiva. (Nataraja is His dynamic form. 4. Guru - Teacher. 5. Janamudra - The touching of the tips of the thumb and forefinger of the right palm raised in benediction signifies the union of Paramatman and Jivatman and thereby shows identity. 6. Maya - Illusion. 7. Samsara - Worldly life. 8. Vedas - Sacred books of Hinduism. Source: URL URLhttp://alpha.math.uga.edu/~sridar/murthy.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 1998 Report Share Posted December 10, 1998 Namaste. I am grateful to Professor V. Krishnamurthy, Shri Ram Chandran, Madhav Kumar and Sridhar for expressing their understanding of tat tvam asi. In addition to DaksiNAmurthy stotra, tat tvam asi is also implied in the ManIsha pa~nchakam verse 1 [T.M.P. Mahadevan's book THE WISDOM OF UNITY on ManIsha pa~nchakam expresses the view that verses 1 to 4 of ManIsha pa~nchakam correspond to each of the four mahAvAkyAs]. I have read somewhere (cannot quote the source right now) that of the four mahAvAkyAs, tat tvam asi is usually taught by the vedanta gurukulas in the earlier stages of human spiritual evolution (earlier compared to the other mahAvAkyAs). I wonder if someone familiar with gurukula teaching can comment on when the students are introduced to this mahAvAkya. I presume that when we say tat and tvam, we are still seeing duality. My objective in introducing this thread is to point out the difficulty in proper attribution of tvam. Tvam is quite distinct from deha, indriya, manas, prAna and ego. Also tvam is that which does not undergo the shhaDbhAva-vikAra (the shhaDbhAvAs being kama, krodha, lobha, moha, mada and matsarya). Quite often, even a learned person contemplating on these concepts can easily mis-attribute tvam to any of the above. Shri Shankara's vAkyavr^tti verse very clearly sets tvam apart from these upAdhis. Once we see tvam is different from all the above, it is easy to see the identity of tat and tvam. Regards Gummuluru Murthy ------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 1998 Report Share Posted December 10, 1998 In our 2 1/2 - 3 year course at Sandeepany West in Piercy, CA with Shri Swami Dayananda, we were taught all of the mahAvAkyas as they appeared in the texts we studied. At what point we encountered which mahAvAkya had more to do with our increased understanding of Sanskrit and capacity to handle more complex language in the text containing the mahAvAkya than any other condition. Most but not all of us had been exposed to Shri Swamiji's public talks in which he gives the essence of the message in simple language. Through those, we had a somehwat clear notion of the nondual. For most of us who had heard those talks, it was that notion of nonduality given which compelled us to put aside all other things and spend 2-3 years in concentrated study. Aikya Param P.O. Box 4193 Berkeley, CA 94704-0193 Advaita Vedanta for Today (graphics) http://members.tripod.com/~aikya/ Advaita Vedanta for Today (text version) http://members.xoom.com/aikya/aikya Gummuluru Murthy <gmurthy advaitin <advaitin > Thursday, December 10, 1998 5:11 AM Re: tat and tvaM >Gummuluru Murthy <gmurthy > > >Namaste. > >I am grateful to Professor V. Krishnamurthy, Shri Ram Chandran, Madhav >Kumar and Sridhar for expressing their understanding of tat tvam asi. >In addition to DaksiNAmurthy stotra, tat tvam asi is also implied in >the ManIsha pa~nchakam verse 1 [T.M.P. Mahadevan's book THE WISDOM OF >UNITY on ManIsha pa~nchakam expresses the view that verses 1 to 4 of >ManIsha pa~nchakam correspond to each of the four mahAvAkyAs]. > >I have read somewhere (cannot quote the source right now) that of the >four mahAvAkyAs, tat tvam asi is usually taught by the vedanta gurukulas >in the earlier stages of human spiritual evolution (earlier compared to >the other mahAvAkyAs). I wonder if someone familiar with gurukula teaching >can comment on when the students are introduced to this mahAvAkya. I >presume that when we say tat and tvam, we are still seeing duality. > >My objective in introducing this thread is to point out the difficulty >in proper attribution of tvam. Tvam is quite distinct from deha, indriya, >manas, prAna and ego. Also tvam is that which does not undergo the >shhaDbhAva-vikAra (the shhaDbhAvAs being kama, krodha, lobha, moha, mada >and matsarya). Quite often, even a learned person contemplating on these >concepts can easily mis-attribute tvam to any of the above. Shri >Shankara's vAkyavr^tti verse very clearly sets tvam apart from these >upAdhis. Once we see tvam is different from all the above, it is easy >to see the identity of tat and tvam. > >Regards >Gummuluru Murthy >------ > > > > > >------ >Help support ONElist, while generating interest in your product or >service. ONElist has a variety of advertising packages. Visit >/advert.html for more information. >------ >Discussion of Sankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy, its true meaning, profundity, richness and beauty with the focus on the non-duality between mind and matter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.