Guest guest Posted January 17, 1999 Report Share Posted January 17, 1999 Part II Samkhya and Yoga (Historical Perspective of Indian Religious Thoughts) The SAmkhya school was founded by Kapila, who lived probably in the seventh century B.C. The system can be regarded as dualistic, since it recognizes two basic categories in the universe - the purusha and the prakriti. (Chapter 13 of Bhagavad Gita discusses Samkhya philosophy in greater details). The Purusha consists of selves or spirits, eternal entities of consciousness. The prakriti represents the potentiality of nature, the basis of all objective existence. It does not consist of matter alone and includes all resources of nature, material and psychical. The Prakriti is thus the fundamental substance out of which, the SAmkhya claims, the world evolves. This evolution of the prakriti is possible only under the influence of the purusha, and the history of the world is the history of this evolution. SAmkhya believes very strongly in the principle of causation and in fact uses this to show the necessity of assuming the eternal existence of prakriti, for something cannot come out of nothing. But, claims the SAmkhya school, while the cause and the effect are different things distinct from each other, the effect is always present in the cause. The former is just a different arrangement of the latter, both consisting of the same substance. A jar is not a lump of clay from which it is made, but they consist of the same substance. There is an underlying assumption of the indestructibility of substance. Another important SAmkhya contribution to Hindu thought is the doctrine of triguna, the three qualities of nature. The three three qualities are sattva (light, purity, harmonious existence), rajas (energy, passion), and tamas (inertia, darkness). These three conflicting aspects of prakriti play different parts in its evolution. Sattva is primarily responsible for the manifestation of prakriti and the maintenance of its evolution. Rajas causes all activity and tamas is responsible for inertia and restraint. While these qualities conflict with each other, they all have their part in the evolution. Evolution proceeds through various stages. There is first the development of buddhi (intellect), described as the mahat (great). Then evolves the self-sense, the feeling of ego. Gradually develop the five cognitive organs, the five motor organs, and the disciplined mind. (Bhagavad Gita discusses in greater detail the three qualities of nature (Gunas) in chapter 14). For emanicipation from the bondage of one's body, what is needed is the knowledge of the distinction between the purusa and the prakriti, the self and non-self. The self tends to confuse itself with buddhi, the intellect. When the knowledge of the distinction is achieved, the soul is no longer bound by the prakriti. The person becomes a disinterested spectator of the happenings in the world. At death the bond between the purusha and the prakriti is completely dissolved and the emancipated soul, unlike other souls, is free from rebirth. Bondage according to this philosophy, is due to ignorance, and emanicipation comes through knowledge. The SAmkhya has been described as an atheistic philosophy, though this is not entirely correct. The Samkhya pravacana Sutra (attributed to Kapila) finds it unnecessary to make the assumption of the existence of God, though it does not deny it either. It maintains that the existence of God cannot be proved by evidence. The later SAmkhya philosophers seem to abandon this agnostic position and the existence of God is later accepted. VijnAnabhikshu even tries to reconcile the Samkhya views with those of the Vedanta. The philosophical basis of the Yoga is the same as that of the SAmkhya, except that a personal God is introduced into the system. God controls the process of evolution and is, as one might expect, Omniscient and Omnipotent. Periodically He dissolves the cosmos and then initiates the process of evolution again. The Yoga of Sage Patanjali set forth the process of pshychological discipline by which one could attain this release from the misery of mundane experience and transmigration and all emphasized knowledge of one kind or another. In practice, the Yoga system of discipline consists of exercises of the mind and the body, including the very difficult exercise of not exercising them at all. In addition to making us healthier in mind and body in this world, these exercises are supposed to facilitate emancipation. Unlike the SAmkhya system, the Yoga school does not believe that freedom comes only from knowledge; the discipline of the mind and the body is supposed to contribute to the process. Various methods of concentration are recommended, as well as methods of suppressing those mental activities that increase our bondage by making us more dependent on prakriti. The Yoga system of exercises is still commonly practised in India. Apart from those seeking emancipation, there are those who find it a useful way of keeping their mind and body healthy. Some have been attracted by its promise of prompt development of supernatural powers, a promise that, surprisingly, seems to have just as much appeal in this age as in any previous period in history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxmi.l Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I am deeply interested in the Samkhya Philosophy. You seem to have a good study on the subject. Do you agree that it is not a cosmological system at all, and hence it has far larger share of critics? Do you have more posts on the topic of Samkhya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.