Guest guest Posted March 31, 1999 Report Share Posted March 31, 1999 namaste. As I was reflecting further on Shri Shankara's brahmasutrAbhAshhya (BSB) over the past week, a statement in Vireswarananda's commentary on Shri Shankara's work caught the attention. Discussing BSB 1.1.2, Vireswarananda says in part and I quote: ".... The prime object of this Sutra (1.1.2 janmAdyasya yatah), therefore, is not to establish Brahman through inference but to discuss scriptural passages which declare that Brahman is the First Cause (texts like Taitt U. 3.1). Once the scriptures have declared Brahman to be the First Cause, reasoning may be taken advantage of in so far as they do not contradict the scriptures, but rather supplement them, in ascertaining the sense of the Vedanta texts. Such reasoning must be corroborative of the truth inculcated. [From here on my emphasis (GM) but still Vireswarananda's writing]. *This kind of reasoning include hearing of the texts (Sravana), thinking about their meaning (Manana), and meditation on them (NididhyAsana). This leads to intuition. By intuition is meant that mental modification (vr^tti) of the mind (Chitta) which destroys our ignorance about Brahman. When the ignorance is destroyed by this mental modification in the form of Brahman (BrahmAkAravr^tti), Brahman, which is self-luminous, reveals Itself. [Here is my further emphasis (GM) but still Vireswarananda's writing] **In ordinary perception, when we cognize an object, the mind (Chitta) takes the form of the external object, which destroys the ignorance about it, and consciousness reflected in this modification of the mind manifests the object.** In the case of Brahman, however, the mental modification destroys the ignorance, but Brahman, which is consciousness pure and simple, manifests Itself, being self-luminous.*...." Now, as I understand the above passage, which is obviously by Shri Shankara (although I do not have the original bhAshhya): Intuition is mental modification. Brahman, being self-luminous, manifests Itself on destoyal of ignorance. The mind, in cognizing an object (any object, lower knowledge), takes the shape and form and size of the external object, and the ignorance about that object is destroyed. Now then, for the destruction of ignorance about an elephant, the mind would take the shape of an elephant and ignorance about that elephant is destroyed. This is true of any object and that is the way the mind functions. ----------------------------- The above can be used in showing that the wake-up and dream state are not different at all. It says that the mind takes the shape of the object for the ignorance about that object to be removed. If it is an elephant, the mind takes the shape (and size) of the elephant. Obviously, mind must be external to the human body for the mind to be able to take this shape. Now, the dream state is accepted to be an illusion because partly the whole dream jagat created by the dreamer cannot be fitted in in the six-foot space the body occupies. Can we not use exactly the same argument to deny reality for the wake-up state, taking that the mind has to take up the shape of the object however big or small it is. That is, what we call mind is external to the body. We can come to this conclusion (that the whole jagat created by the mind is illusory) even while we are in the wake-up state. As usual, I am most grateful for any comments and clarifications. Regards Gummuluru Murthy ------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.