Guest guest Posted May 8, 1999 Report Share Posted May 8, 1999 To Advaitin Members: I am new to the group. I was born in India. I came to America in 1949. I was educated as a physicist and have devoted about 40 years to the field of network science. One can thus see why presently I am interested in entities and their inter-relationships - especially what we have been calling Ultimate Reality and entities called human minds/souls. I will be looking forward to exchanging my ideas with those of others. Thank you for accepting me as a member. Roshan L. Sharma, Adjunct Professor, SMU, Dallas Roshan L. Sharma <rsharma 214-691-6790 <voice> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 1999 Report Share Posted May 8, 1999 Roshan L. Sharma [rsharma] Saturday, May 08, 1999 10:51 AM advaitin Re: New to advaitin "Roshan L. Sharma" <rsharma To Advaitin Members: I am new to the group. I was born in India. I came to America in 1949. I was educated as a physicist and have devoted about 40 years to the field of network science. One can thus see why presently I am interested in entities and their inter-relationships - especially what we have been calling Ultimate Reality and entities called human minds/souls Harsha: We can speak of relationships between entities (or between entities and the Ultimate Reality) in a meaningful way, if we first define or find out what constitutes an entity. This is the central issue and the paradox and a good starting point in Advaita. If an entity (human mind/soul) initiates a study of the nature of relationships between itself and others, it will indeed be valuable but such knowledge might limit itself to the psychological arena. Ramana Maharshi and other Advaitic sages have thus suggested turning the mind towards its source using the faculty of self-awareness. So the core question, instead of focusing on what constitutes the nature of relationships between entities, must be instead; What constitutes the identity of the entity? Is the identity of an entity defined by relationships the entity has with external or the internal perceptions, or does it exist independently of all relationships and perceptions. If we accept the Vedic teachings that the Self depends on absolutely nothing, is pure Sat-Chit-Ananda, and is One without a second, then we must concluded that the entity is the Self and the Self is in fact unrelated to anything, there being nothing other than IT Self to relate to. So the Vedas state clearly. Thou are That. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.