Guest guest Posted May 11, 1999 Report Share Posted May 11, 1999 > >Ram Chandran <chandran > >Greetings: > >Pure Religion on the other hand Identifies that the ultimate reality >(God) is the root and source of all that science studies. Can >scientific methods be applied to knowing the "ultimate" questions, such >as "Where did I come from? Where am I going? Is there a optimum way to >live my life? Did I exist before I was born? Will I exist after I die?" > >Religion is based on faith (belief) and conviction and can’t be >scientifically evaluated for its content and relevance. Scientific >facts can be logically tested and either they are rejected or accepted. >There is no logical way of testing religious viewpoints and we can’t >reject them using scientific methods. The viewpoints that are rejected >using scientific methods fall short of the definition of ‘Religion.’ > Dear Shri Ram Chandran, I am attaching a discussion on faith with Ramana below and it may be of interest to you. No doubt the common notion in recent times is that faith is illogical, blind, meant for the less capable who cannot enquire on their own etc. However this need not be what seers meant by faith in earlier times. D: Devotee; M:Maharshi A visitor asked: Sri Bhagavan said last night that God is guiding us. Then why should we make an effort to do anything? M: Who asks you to do so? If there was that faith in the guidance of God this question would not have arisen. D: How shall I secure that firm faith? M: Exactly. It is for such as these who want instructions. There are persons who seek freedom from misery.They are told that God guides all and so there need not be any concern about what happens. If they are of the best type they at once believe it and firmly abide by faith in God. But there are others who are not so easily convinced of the truth of the bare statement. They ask "Who is God? What is His nature? Where is He? How can He be realised?" and so on. In order to satisfy them intellectual discussion is found necessary. Statements are made, their pros and cons are argued and the truth is thus made clear to the intellect. When the matter is understood intellectually the earnest seeker begins to apply it practically. He argues at every moment, "For whom are these thoughts? Who am I?" and so forth, until he is well established in the conviction that a Higher Power guides us. That is firmness of faith. Then all his doubts are cleared and ne needs no further instructions. D: We also have faith in God. M: If it had been firm no questions would have arisen. The person will remain perfectly happy in his Faith in the Omnipotent. D: Is the enquiry into the Self the same as the above mentioned faith? M: The enquiry into the Self is inclusive of all, faith, devotion, jnana, yoga and all. So faith (at least for Ramana and a few others) is *not* the denial of logic or reasoning. Rather it is the culmination of of the process of logic and reason. Neither the popular religious swamis nor the acclaimed scientists of today seem to have understood this. Hence the widespread acceptance that faith is opposed to reason, and religion is divided from science. Regards, ----Viswanath _____________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.