Guest guest Posted July 14, 1999 Report Share Posted July 14, 1999 Dear Jan, Thanks for your response .... > Probably for this reason the Buddha choose to > describe the accompanying K. phenomena at attainment of nirvana in such a > way that it wouldn't make any sense "before", only "after". As far as I knew, Buddhists very openly and precisely described such phenomena (ie. Visuddimagga for instance) and labelled them as merely preliminary stages caused by increased power of mental concentration. They seemed to unequivocally state they are NOT god, self, or nirvana and do not belong to any god, self, etc. They seemed to recommend merely noting the arising and cessation of all such events without further comment or concern because they are considered to have nothing to do with nirvana or its attainment (beyond indicating a certain degree of mental focus which does not by itself bring liberation). I have never seen any mention of Kundalini effects whatsoever in the context of Nirvana. Can you give me a reference here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 1999 Report Share Posted July 15, 1999 The title of the book was something like "Buddhist moral and ethics", the writer the Ven. Saddhatissa (from Sri Lanka). The chapter of the book where this is stated is called "the ultimate goal" and what is more, there are two events where the phenomena occur: nirvana with substratum remaining and nirvana without substratum. As my interest only concerned removal of the substratum and the book in no way gave the idea nirvana is rare, Sri Lanka was visited twenty-five years ago; many monks didn't know Ven. Saddhatissa's and called the book a heresy because of the remarks concerning nirvana . Finding the book will be difficult; it was printed during the fifties but when I bought it, it was from an antiquarian bookseller. The issue was interesting because Rosicrucians make no mystery of the fact that the mystic union, union of Shiva and Shakti or whatever it is called, isn't the end from the perspective of K. transformations. The end of transformations is symbolized by the snake, eating its own tail. Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.