Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

reply to Jan

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Jan,

 

Thanks for your response ....

> Probably for this reason the Buddha choose to

> describe the accompanying K. phenomena at

attainment of nirvana in such a

> way that it wouldn't make any sense "before",

only "after".

 

As far as I knew, Buddhists very openly and

precisely described such phenomena (ie.

Visuddimagga for instance) and labelled them as

merely preliminary stages caused by increased

power of mental concentration. They seemed to

unequivocally state they are NOT god, self, or

nirvana and do not belong to any god, self, etc.

They seemed to recommend merely noting the arising

and cessation of all such events without further

comment or concern because they are considered to

have nothing to do with nirvana or its attainment

(beyond indicating a certain degree of mental

focus which does not by itself bring liberation).

I have never seen any mention of Kundalini effects

whatsoever in the context of Nirvana. Can you

give me a reference here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The title of the book was something like "Buddhist moral and ethics", the

writer the Ven. Saddhatissa (from Sri Lanka). The chapter of the book where

this is stated is called "the ultimate goal" and what is more, there are two

events where the phenomena occur: nirvana with substratum remaining and

nirvana without substratum. As my interest only concerned removal of the

substratum and the book in no way gave the idea nirvana is rare, Sri Lanka

was visited twenty-five years ago; many monks didn't know Ven. Saddhatissa's

and called the book a heresy because of the remarks concerning nirvana :).

Finding the book will be difficult; it was printed during the fifties but

when I bought it, it was from an antiquarian bookseller.

 

The issue was interesting because Rosicrucians make no mystery of the fact

that the mystic union, union of Shiva and Shakti or whatever it is called,

isn't the end from the perspective of K. transformations. The end of

transformations is symbolized by the snake, eating its own tail.

 

Jan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...