Guest guest Posted November 25, 1999 Report Share Posted November 25, 1999 >From Sue (translator - Swami Chetanananda) Avadhuta Gita Chapter 1 Verse 57 In the Atman there is neither knowledge nor ignorance nor the combination of the two. He who always has this knowledge becomes knowledge Itself and nothing else. (comments) Combination of the two - According to a Ritualistic school, knowledge and ignorance can coexist as we see both light and darkness in a firefly. In its view, a person can perform ritualistic action even after illumination. The school of Advaita Vedanta, however, does not agree with this. It says that knowledge and ignorance, like day and night, cannot coexist. This knowledge - That is, the knowledge of the Self. The Mundaka Upanishad says, "The knower of Brahman becomes Brahman." (3.2.9) Vivekananda Centre Site http://www.btinternet.com/~vivekananda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 1999 Report Share Posted November 25, 1999 >From Sue >(translator - Swami Chetanananda) > >Avadhuta Gita Chapter 1 Verse 57 > >In the Atman there is neither knowledge nor ignorance nor the >combination >of the two. He who always has this knowledge becomes >knowledge Itself and >nothing else. > >(comments) > >Combination of the two - According to a Ritualistic school, knowledge and >ignorance can coexist as we see both light and darkness in a firefly. In >its view, a person can perform ritualistic action even after illumination. >The school of Advaita Vedanta, however, does not agree with this. It says >that knowledge and ignorance, like day and night, cannot coexist. Does Advaita Vedanta really say that knowledge and ignorance cannot co-exist? I find that somewhat unfathomable. After all, Advaita is all about non-duality. Knowledge and ignorance, like day and night, are a duality. One pair of the opposition has no meaning without the other. Either part alone cannot not exist independently. I would say, then, that knowledge and ignorance, like day and night, can not exist without the other. This is one reason why I have been having a hard time comprehending Shri Jaishankar when he writes that only the self-knowledge engendered by the Vedas can dissolve ignorance. From what I understand, you can't have one without the other. To experience the non-dual Self, one has to get away from notions of both knowledge and ignorance. In other words, transcend the illusion of duality or two-ness. But this duality or mode of thinking in terms of dualities is just a fabrication of the mind/intellect. In reality, there is just the non-dual Brahman. However, I wouldn't attempt to pass off this understanding as Advaita Vedanta per se. Certainly, there is the influence of Advaita in it. So, I would be interested in knowing what others conceive of as the relationship between knowledge and ignorance, and how various Advaitans have imaged the resolution of such dualities. with love and joy Veronica (D. Hill) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.