Guest guest Posted November 29, 1999 Report Share Posted November 29, 1999 Greetings: First, let me confirm that I am fallible! The moment I try to interpret what you mean or when you try to interpret what I mean, we both become fallible. We can never understand a Jnani until become one. To know Brahman, we have to be the Brahman! The statement that "All Scriptures are subject to error" comes from our perception of the scriptures and we are fallible and hence our percpetions are fallible! This paradox can be only resolved if and when we go beyond our perception! The emergence of any doubt confirms that either or both of us are ignorant and fallible. We also expose our ignorance when we pretend to be free from doubts. We have to silence our thoughts to silence our ignorance. Most of the time that we pretend that we are silent! regards, Ram Chandran >Greg Goode <goode > >At 01:05 PM 11/29/99 -0500, Ram Chandran wrote: > >About point (3) Did I misunderstand - did you mean this: > >>3. Due to our subjective bias toward Jnanis, we think that they say >different things about "Truth." Consequently, we even go to the extent >saying that Jnanis are fallible. > >Or did you mean to say "infallible"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 1999 Report Share Posted November 29, 1999 At 01:05 PM 11/29/99 -0500, Ram Chandran wrote: Ram-ji, About point (3) Did I misunderstand - did you mean this: >3. Due to our subjective bias toward Jnanis, we think that they say different things about "Truth." Consequently, we even go to the extent saying that Jnanis are fallible. Or did you mean to say "infallible"? Om! --Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.