Guest guest Posted December 9, 1999 Report Share Posted December 9, 1999 Hari Om Sri Thiagarajan: (This is question raised by a member of another forum and subject is quite relevant for this list) You have an interesting question and let me try to answer on the basis of my understanding of the symbolism behind these stories. First, Hari (Vishnu) and Haran (Siva) both represent Ishwara (Saguna Brahman). In Tamil Nadu, the name Hariharan is quite common and. Smartas (those who follow the Sampradhyam (ttraditions) Shankara Maths) accept and worship them both wholeheartedly. The Tamil Proverb, " Hariyum Sivanum Onru, Ariyathavar Vayile Mannu" ( (Those who fail to understand the unity between Hari and Sivan continue to face the misery of ignorance!). In both your stories, Ishwara's behavior appears asymmetrical to human mind. The same human mind also raises another question ‘Why Me?,' if and when we face failures or tragedies! Fundamentally, these questions and doubts arise in the human mind where ‘plurality' prevails like the water in the ocean. One simple answer to these question is the following -‘These doubts and questions just confirm that we are still ignorant and only Ishwara knows the Truth!' Both these stories want to emphasize that we need the ‘faith' that Ishwara is omnipotent and omnipresent. These stories are quite subtle with deep messages to strengthen faith. These stories contain two parts: what really happened and what we infer out of what happened: Story 1: What happened? Panchali served few grains of rice to Ishwara and Sage Dhurvasa and his disciples who indicated to come for the Biksha. When Ishwara fulfilled his hunger, it fulfilled the hunger of Sage Dhurvasa and his disciples and consequently they didn't feel hungry any more! Inference: Sage Dhurvasa and disciples are the most relevant characters to this story and the rest of the population becomes irrelevant! There is nothing in the story to dispute that others did not fulfill their hunger! Story 2: What happened? An old and poor woman in the city of Madurai maintained her living through selling "Puttu" (very simple food prepared by steaming cream of rice and brown sugar). Everyday, just before selling she offered the puttu to Siva through mental prayers and got His blessings. What she sold the public was the "prasad" at very nominal price just sufficient for her to maintain living. The Pandiyan king wanted to construct a big water tank and ordered that every household including the old woman to provide an adult labor for the project. This poor old woman had no strength to participate in the construction project and she prayed Siva for his help. Suddenly, a young man (Siva) came and told her that he is fond of her puttu and will work on her behalf if she agrees to provide him a small quantity of puttu during the construction period. The old woman was quite happy and handed him a small pocket of puttu for his lunch. The young man was enjoying the putting during the break and apparently fell sleep at the construct Inference: The central theme of the story is not the strike, but the Bhakti of the old woman and the compassion of Siva toward the Bhakta. Pains and sufferings are never there in reality and they are just human perception. The story just confirms that as humans, we can only perceive pains and sufferings and they are universal and no one can escape from it. We have go beyond our perception to understand the mystics of human life and our true nature! ============================================ Ramu Thiagarajan writes: Namaste: I have another query regarding the absence of symmetry in our scriptures. Let me elaborate. I am sure many of you are aware of this and have probably thought about this. Unlike my earlier query, there may not be a definitive answer to this, so thoughts and opinions are welcome. The story goes that at the behest of Panchali, Lord Krishna appeared to help the Pandavas when Sage Dhurvasa appeared all of a sudden. Panchali had no food left and did not know what to do, so she prayed for help to the Lord. Lord Krishna appeared and had the few morsels of food in the Acshaya Patram and Sage Dhurvasa and his disciples were satiated and the crisis was averted and a valuable lesson was learnt. Now the stage moves to Madurai. (I am not entirely sure about the sequence here., so my apologies if I mixed up the names etc.) The story relates to Lord Shiva who is referred to in the Tamil saying "Puttuku Man Sumanthu, Perambu Athi Pattavan" The story is that Lord Sundaresvarar appeared as an employee during the building of the Madurai temple. He was beaten by either the King or his employees when HE was working and when HE was beaten by the rope, the WHOLE world felt the beating and everyone's back had the marks of the punishment.!! Here is the asymmetry: When Lord Krishna ate the food, the WHOLE WORLD did not feel satiated., instead only a select group felt satisfied. However., when Lord Shiva was hit, the WHOLE WORLD felt the punishment. Why this asymmetry? What is the Tatparyam (inner meaning) here? I know that there is one., because has been discussed by scholars and I know that Maha Periyaval discussed it. But I am unable to unearth the particular lecture in which this was discussed. Thoughts and suggestions are welcome. Hari OM Ramu Thiagarajan ==================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.