Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

gaudapada-sankara/maya

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

"When you have a headache you take it for granted that you have a

head.Gaudapada would say:'What!You say you have a headache!My friend, you

have no head!' He permitted no 'erroneous' expression,none

whatsoever.Sankara, on the other hand,would accept your erroneous

statement,i.e.,'I have a headache', as a premise,and would then logically

prove to you that the premise was wrong.He would say:'I will admit and

accept their ravings ,and then show them that they are wrong.Only One

exists.Look closer,brother;not two-but One!'So sankara accepts the erroneous

statement that the universe exists,and then logically leads us to the

acceptance of the Fundamantal Reality.

-from 'Yoga for Beginners' by

swami.gnaneswarananda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello friends.

 

Devendra Vyas wrote:

> "Devendra Vyas" <dev_vyas74

>

> "When you have a headache you take it for granted that you have a

> head.Gaudapada would say:'What!You say you have a headache!My friend, you

> have no head!' He permitted no 'erroneous' expression,none

> whatsoever.Sankara, on the other hand,would accept your erroneous

> statement,i.e.,'I have a headache', as a premise,and would then logically

> prove to you that the premise was wrong.He would say:'I will admit and

> accept their ravings ,and then show them that they are wrong.Only One

> exists.Look closer,brother;not two-but One!'So sankara accepts the erroneous

> statement that the universe exists,and then logically leads us to the

> acceptance of the Fundamantal Reality.

> -from 'Yoga for Beginners' by

> swami.gnaneswarananda.

 

I guess what I want to ask is this ~

 

What would it be like to have no experiences forever? Or is that no experiencer

to experience?

Is Witness an experiencer, a Knower?

 

I guess at present I am kind of thinking of It as .. how two .. (meaning one's

own form too,) to merge with .. makes the One, Known.

 

I read somewhere that in order to Know Oneness there needs be even just a brief

moment of something to merge with. That in order to have One you need two.

 

Otherwise Oneness would never be Known as experiential bliss perhaps. And that

this is the new perception .. constant merging in union .. with It All as if

merging with One's Self.

This makes for tasting differences as one's Self perhaps. I dunno I am just

putting it out there for discussion.

 

Bye now,

 

Colette

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colette wrote:

 

I read somewhere that in order to Know Oneness there needs be even just a brief

moment of something to merge with. That in order to have One you need two.

 

 

 

Hi Colette! What you say makes perfect sense from the yogic perspective.

 

Harsha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi gentle Harsha :-)

 

Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar) wrote:

> "Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar)" <hluthar

>

> Colette wrote:

>

> I read somewhere that in order to Know Oneness there needs be even just a

brief moment of something to merge with. That in order to have One you need two.

>

> Hi Colette! What you say makes perfect sense from the yogic perspective.

>

> Harsha

 

Yes a 'something' to unify 'with' I heard.

 

And even one may observe it as one observes oneself.

 

Samhita ~ the three in one process ~

Rishi devata & chandas ~ knower knowing & object of knowing all merge as one.

Even One's self is 'the object' of attention ~ observation & union with).

Thus conciousness becomes conscious of It Self.

Therein lies the delight.

So some say.

 

Bye now,

 

Col

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi!

Where there is oneness there is everything or nothing, neither of which can be

known or understood by the mind or the senses. Where there is two (or more) the

logical mind needs to create merging (with time element) for oneness. The

oneness is known

only by experience and the experience is possible only in the "mind-less" or

"non-ego" state.

-- Vis

 

Colette wrote:

> Colette <colette

>

> Hello friends.

>

> Devendra Vyas wrote:

>

> > "Devendra Vyas" <dev_vyas74

> >

> > "When you have a headache you take it for granted that you have a

> > head.Gaudapada would say:'What!You say you have a headache!My friend, you

> > have no head!' He permitted no 'erroneous' expression,none

> > whatsoever.Sankara, on the other hand,would accept your erroneous

> > statement,i.e.,'I have a headache', as a premise,and would then logically

> > prove to you that the premise was wrong.He would say:'I will admit and

> > accept their ravings ,and then show them that they are wrong.Only One

> > exists.Look closer,brother;not two-but One!'So sankara accepts the erroneous

> > statement that the universe exists,and then logically leads us to the

> > acceptance of the Fundamantal Reality.

> > -from 'Yoga for Beginners' by

> > swami.gnaneswarananda.

>

> I guess what I want to ask is this ~

>

> What would it be like to have no experiences forever? Or is that no

experiencer to experience?

> Is Witness an experiencer, a Knower?

>

> I guess at present I am kind of thinking of It as .. how two .. (meaning

one's own form too,) to merge with .. makes the One, Known.

>

> I read somewhere that in order to Know Oneness there needs be even just a

brief moment of something to merge with. That in order to have One you need two.

>

> Otherwise Oneness would never be Known as experiential bliss perhaps. And that

this is the new perception .. constant merging in union .. with It All as if

merging with One's Self.

> This makes for tasting differences as one's Self perhaps. I dunno I am just

putting it out there for discussion.

>

> Bye now,

>

> Colette

>

> > Discussion of the True Meaning of Sankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy

focusing on non-duality between mind and matter. Searchable List Archives are

available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ Contact Email Address:

advaitins

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...