Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 Dear Jay > > Dear Sadanandji > > Technically this cannot be an answer - at best it can be called a > response. You are falling in the trap of answering a question > which you have qualified as invalid. > > Spiritual dialogue is great fun..... but we have to make sure > it does not degenerate into mere mental gymnastics. > It has to be tangible - it has to be experienced first hand. > Mere mental acceptance has very limited milage. > > What do the list members think? > > jay : ) > Vivekananda Centre London To be fair, Sri Sadanandaji has answered this question: >> Our present state is according to our karma of last life. then I want to KNOW is at the first time why did we came here? Before that what is the our state ? >> Creation is beginning less. Hence one cannot say how and why -One can come up with theories but those are only to satisfy an intellect to some degree. Honest answer is - there is no beginning. regards Sundar Rajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 advaitin, "Vivekananda Centre" <vivekananda@b...> wrote: > - > jagannath M > Monday, April 08, 2002 12:11 > Question > > > I am Jagannath. I got the e-mail address from the website. > I request you to please answer my basic question on spirituality. > > 1). If we are all part of the God then why did we came to this world ?. > Our present state is according to our karma of last life. then I > want to KNOW is at the first time why did we came here? > Before that what is the our state ? and after getting Mukti what > will be our state? > Namaste Shri Jagannath, Here is my answer to your question. Broadly speaking there are two states of being. State0: State of Brahman State1: State where the illusion of duality is witnessed. State0 is the absolute truth. However, for reasons that will never ever be known, the Being desires to entertain itself by transiting from State0 into State1. Now it has been this way for eternity and IT WILL BE THIS WAY FOR ETERNITY. This game is beginningless and endless. Why ? It is just the nature of this Being to play and keep jumping between States0 and State1. Problem is not in State1 itself. Problem is the helplessness (apparent bondage) that the Being feels while it is in state1. Mukti is simply, the Being reminding itself WHILE IN STATE1 that it is all its own play. Mukti is simply the Being learning the rules of the play WHILE IN STATE1 so that it starts enjoying the play rather than suffering while playing. Mukti is NOT transiting into state0 forever. State0 is beyond the control of State1. As mentioned above, the Being in State0 is an eternal player and will always transit into state1. There is nothing that you can do about it. State0 is so great that anything the Being does in State1, may it be the worst possible act, fails to affect the State0 even a bit. Hope this helps, Best regards Shrinivas Gadkari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 Namaskar My Friends New to List : ) What if his answer that he has qualified as being his answer based on his understanding really and truley is his answer regardless of the question Any comments from list members on this possibility : ) Aum NamaSivaya Sivaya Nama Aum DharmaDev Arya Vivekananda Centre <vivekananda kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada; adv list <advaitin> Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:01 PM Re: Re: Question >- >"kuntimaddi sadananda" <kuntimaddisada ><advaitin>; <vivekananda >Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:52 >Re: Re: Question > >> Shree Jagannath, >> >> Here is my answer to your question based on my >> understanding. >> >> Your question involves some contraditions. "If we are >> part of God then whey did we come into this world?" - ><snip>..... > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >Dear Sadanandji > >Technically this cannot be an answer - at best it can be called a >response. You are falling in the trap of answering a question >which you have qualified as invalid. > >Spiritual dialogue is great fun..... but we have to make sure >it does not degenerate into mere mental gymnastics. >It has to be tangible - it has to be experienced first hand. >Mere mental acceptance has very limited milage. > >What do the list members think? > >jay : ) >Vivekananda Centre London > > > >Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. >Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ >To Post a message send an email to : advaitin >Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages > > > >Your use of is subject to > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 dear list, yes, the main point in any question is to try to understand who am I, the question is a product of a mind caught in the grip of ignorance. there for all questions that come from a sincere seeker after self knowledge are valid question and worthy of a knowledgeable answer. jaya --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.344 / Virus Database: 191 - Release 2/04/2002 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 > Dear Sadanandji > > Technically this cannot be an answer - at best it can be called a > response. You are falling in the trap of answering a question > which you have qualified as invalid. > > Spiritual dialogue is great fun..... but we have to make sure > it does not degenerate into mere mental gymnastics. > It has to be tangible - it has to be experienced first hand. > Mere mental acceptance has very limited milage. > > What do the list members think? > > jay : ) > Vivekananda Centre London Dear Jay, To be fair, Sri Sadanandji did answer this question > Our present state is according to our karma of > last life. then I > want to KNOW is at the first time why did we > came here? > Before that what is the our state ? with this answer: Creation is beginning less. Hence one cannot say how and why -One can come up with theories but those are only to satisfy an intellect to some degree. Honest answer is - there is no beginning. To the question, > and after > getting Mukti what > will be our state? The scriptures address this state of 'JivanMukti' in lots of places. But here are a couple of pointers. In the Gita, Lord Krishna indicates what happens when the Sadhaka gets a first 'glimpse' at the state of Moksha. (I have left out some details to keep it simple here.) : yaM labdhvaa cha aparaM laabhaM manyate na adhikaM tataH . yasmin sthito na duHkhena guruNaapi vichaalyate .. 6.22.. Obtaining which one does not think of any other acquisition to be superior to that, and being established in which one is not perturbed even by great sorrow; When that 'attempt' is stabilised and the self-knowledge becomes steady: When the Self is realized, the Sadhaka realizes whatever has to be accomplished has been accomplished, and whatever has to be acquired has been acquired. (Apastamba Dharma Sutras, 1.22.2) regards Sundar Rajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 > Dear Sadanandji > > Technically this cannot be an answer - at best it can be called a > response. You are falling in the trap of answering a question > which you have qualified as invalid. > > Spiritual dialogue is great fun..... but we have to make sure > it does not degenerate into mere mental gymnastics. > It has to be tangible - it has to be experienced first hand. > Mere mental acceptance has very limited milage. > > What do the list members think? > > jay : ) > Vivekananda Centre London Dear Jay, To be fair, Sri Sadanandji did answer this question > Our present state is according to our karma of > last life. then I > want to KNOW is at the first time why did we > came here? > Before that what is the our state ? with this answer: Creation is beginning less. Hence one cannot say how and why -One can come up with theories but those are only to satisfy an intellect to some degree. Honest answer is - there is no beginning. To the question, and after > getting Mukti what > will be our state? The scriptures address this in lots of places. But here are a couple of pointers. In the Gita, Lord Krishna indicates what happens when the Sadhaka gets a first 'glimpse' at the state of Moksha. (I have left out some details to keep it simple here.) : yaM labdhvaa cha aparaM laabhaM manyate na adhikaM tataH . yasmin sthito na duHkhena guruNaapi vichaalyate .. 6.22.. Obtaining which one does not think of any other acquisition to be superior to that, and being established in which one is not perturbed even by great sorrow; When that 'attempt' is stabilised and the self-knowledge becomes steady: When the Self is realized, the Sadhaka realizes whatever has to be accomplished has been accomplished, and whatever has to be acquired has been acquired. (Apastamba Dharma Sutras, 1.22.2) regards Sundar Rajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 Namaste, Shankara's Bhaja Govindam (Moha Mudgara), verse 23 has the same phrase: kastvaM ko.ahaM kuta aayaataH kaa me jananii ko me taataH . ............. Who are you? Who am I? Whence have we come? Who is my mother? Who is my father? ............... He then gives some of the means to find out the answers. The question 'why' dissolves by itself once the source is reached. Till then one's 'karma', which includes the paying off of one's debts that have been incurred (to gods, ancestors, creatures, etc.) has to be fulfilled. Declaring the 'ego' as bankrupt, - and in Sri Ramakrishna's words- giving the power of attorney to the Supreme, releases one from the debts speedily! Regards, Sunder advaitin, "JAYA" <jaya@b...> wrote: > dear list, > > yes, the main point in any question is to try to understand who am I, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2002 Report Share Posted April 16, 2002 Namaste Sri Jay: All replies that any member posts with respect to any question is always his/her response. Such responses may or may not clarify the doubts of all members - some members may be quite satisfied and others may not. Even such agreements and disagreements are not permanant and can change over time. For those who have strong conviction to 'theory of karma' such questions will not arise! Please understand that Sadaji did not try to prove but just treat the question more seriously and try to explain with a complete response. We should thankful to him for taking his time to provide a satisfactory answer on the basis of his understanding. Here is a response from Sadaji's guru, Swami Chinmayanandaji: Swami Chinmayanandaji was quite tactful in responding to questions such as the one raised by Sri Jagnath. Once someone during a discourse asked him the same question - 'When did first karma (vasana) begin?' Swamiji said, "It is a beautiful question and let answer you after the discourse." The devotee was very pleased, and met Swamiji at the end of his discourse. Swamiji gave him a pen and white sheet of paper and asked him to write the question in bold letters. The devotee wrote in big bold letters the question and brought to Swamiji. Swamiji told him to fold the paper very carefully and put it in his pocket. The devotee followed Swamiji's direction and then asked Swamiji, "Can you please tell me the answer?" Now Swamiji with big smile, asked him to sit down and said: "You should keep this paper safetly with you and when you get liberated, you should take this paper directly to God and He will provide you with the answer!" After hearing this, the devotee sat in front of him for few minutes and he understood the implied answer. Swamiji later explained to the devotee that 'Karma' is aNati and is beginningless! Warmest regards, Ram Chandran advaitin, "Vivekananda Centre" <vivekananda@b...> wrote: > Dear Sadanandji > > Technically this cannot be an answer - at best it can be called a > response. You are falling in the trap of answering a question > which you have qualified as invalid. > > Spiritual dialogue is great fun..... but we have to make sure > it does not degenerate into mere mental gymnastics. > It has to be tangible - it has to be experienced first hand. > Mere mental acceptance has very limited milage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 Vivekananda Centre <vivekananda wrote: - jagannath M Monday, April 08, 2002 12:11 Question I am Jagannath. I got the e-mail address from the website. I request you to please answer my basic question on spirituality. 1). If we are all part of the God then why did we came to this world ?. Our present state is according to our karma of last life. then I want to KNOW is at the first time why did we came here? Before that what is the our state ? and after getting Mukti what will be our state? ----------------------------- Dear shri Jagannath, Before going into answering your interesting question,could you please do vichara on the following points and respond? 1.Am I convinced that I am a part of God? If yes, who has convinced me that I am so? Am I convinced that God is greater than me? If so, should not I strive to be like him? Since I am a part of Him, there is no reason for my not baecoming the whole of Him! 2.You appear to believe in karma and are convinced that your present life is due to your past life's karmas. Is this belief based on some studies made by you in this life or due to some body having told you so and your having fallen for it! Do vichara. 3.As human beings, we are endowed with the rare commodity called Budhi.We also have Intelligence because of which we do not want to accept anything on face value.We are also endowed with a Mind with which we can do vichara. Our Hindu Scriptures prescribe the following line of Vichara: "Ko Aham" ---- "Who am I?" "Katham Idam Jaatam"-----"How has all this that I see around me come about?" "Kovai kartaasya vidyute"----"By whose action do all these exist?" "Upaadaanam kim asti?"-----"What is the material with which all this has been produced?" Shall respond further if I hear from you. Hari OM! Swaminarayan Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ To Post a message send an email to : advaitin Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 Dear Jagannath, To answer your question in shankara's adavita perspective the hymn "vishvam darpana" in shrI dakshiNAmUrti stotra. I guess what Jaya had explained was in sync with that. I do not know how many members of this group would accept, but let me try to explain in the shaiva sidhdhantha perspective. shaiva sidhdhantha also accepts advaita, but in shaiva sidhdhantha context advaita is qualitative than quantitative. As per that philosophy there are three permanent (anAti) things. God, souls and bonds (pati, pashu and pAsam respectively). None originated fromt he other. By nature God is free from bonds and the souls are in bonds. The bonds or impurities are of three types - ANava, karma, mAya. ANava is the mUla mala and the pashus had only that. God out of Its Grace on pashus gave the bodies out of mAya. So here mAya though a filth is also a boon to the pashu. How is that possible ? When the vessels are dirty and oily, we apply soap. soap is also a filth because unless you wash that off you cannot use the vessel for eating. But it cleans the stronger sticking dirt (here ANava). (This is in contrast to shankara advaita which considers mAya as the mala). From the subtle bodies pashus had out of the deeds they performed, they acquired karma. At the point of liberation God and soul get to the state of advaita and hence the bonds (pAsham) is off. (I was long time contemplating to write article comparing and contrasting the shankara advaita, kashmiri shaiva advaita and shaiva sidhdhantha, though do not know how scholarly it would be. If parameshvara's Grace be there to do that one it would come out.) Thank you. namaH shivAya love, Ganesh ------------------------ Visit Shaivam Home Page at http://www.shaivam.org ------------------------ advaitin, "Vivekananda Centre" <vivekananda@b...> wrote: > - > jagannath M > Monday, April 08, 2002 12:11 > Question > > > I am Jagannath. I got the e-mail address from the website. > I request you to please answer my basic question on spirituality. > > 1). If we are all part of the God then why did we came to this world ?. > Our present state is according to our karma of last life. then I > want to KNOW is at the first time why did we came here? > Before that what is the our state ? and after getting Mukti what > will be our state? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~response from Vivekananda Centre ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Dear Jagannath > > > Very good question..... let us see what response our list can provide. > We do not promise that we will 'answer your question'. > But I am sure we will respond to your question > in a wide variety of ways. > > jay Vivekananda Centre London > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 (somehow the previous time I posted did not appear in the list. so reposting. Pls bear with me if it repeat !) Dear Jagannath, To answer your question in shankara's adavita perspective the hymn "vishvam darpana" in shrI dakshiNAmUrti stotra. I guess what Jaya had explained was in sync with that. I do not know how many members of this group would accept, but let me try to explain in the shaiva sidhdhantha perspective. shaiva sidhdhantha also accepts advaita, but in shaiva sidhdhantha context advaita is qualitative than quantitative. As per that philosophy there are three permanent (anAti) things. God, souls and bonds (pati, pashu and pAsam respectively). None originated fromt he other. By nature God is free from bonds and the souls are in bonds. The bonds or impurities are of three types - ANava, karma, mAya. ANava is the mUla mala and the pashus had only that. God out of Its Grace on pashus gave the bodies out of mAya. So here mAya though a filth is also a boon to the pashu. How is that possible ? When the vessels are dirty and oily, we apply soap. soap is also a filth because unless you wash that off you cannot use the vessel for eating. But it cleans the stronger sticking dirt (here ANava). (This is in contrast to shankara advaita which considers mAya as the mala). From the subtle bodies pashus had out of the deeds they performed, they acquired karma. At the point of liberation God and soul get to the state of advaita and hence the bonds (pAsham) is off. (I was long time contemplating to write article comparing and contrasting the shankara advaita, kashmiri shaiva advaita and shaiva sidhdhantha, though do not know how scholarly it would be. If parameshvara's Grace be there to do that one it would come out.) Thank you. namaH shivAya love, Ganesh ----------------------- Visit Shaivam Home Page at http://www.shaivam.org ----------------------- advaitin, "Vivekananda Centre" <vivekananda@b...> wrote: > - > jagannath M > Monday, April 08, 2002 12:11 > Question > > > I am Jagannath. I got the e-mail address from the website. > I request you to please answer my basic question on spirituality. > > 1). If we are all part of the God then why did we came to this world ?. > Our present state is according to our karma of last life. then I > want to KNOW is at the first time why did we came here? > Before that what is the our state ? and after getting Mukti what > will be our state? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~response from Vivekananda Centre ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Dear Jagannath > > > Very good question..... let us see what response our list can provide. > We do not promise that we will 'answer your question'. > But I am sure we will respond to your question > in a wide variety of ways. > > jay Vivekananda Centre London > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 > > > > Spiritual dialogue is great fun..... but we have > to make sure > > it does not degenerate into mere mental > gymnastics. > > It has to be tangible - it has to be experienced > first hand. > > Mere mental acceptance has very limited milage. > > > > What do the list members think? > > > > jay : ) > > Vivekananda Centre London > I agree about the mental gymnastics we are all going thru. What are the tangibles that have to experienced first hand? JOEDEV > > Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 advaitin, "Vivekananda Centre" <vivekananda@b...> wrote: [snip] > 1). If we are all part of the God then why did we came to this > world ?. > > Our present state is according to our karma of last life. > then I want to KNOW is at the first time why did we came here? > Before that what is the our state ? and after getting Mukti > what will be our state? We have never come to this world. This world appears to exist but it is as unreal as the one who believes they experience it. Our state before and after mukti is identical, as are all states inbetween, being identical with Brahman. There is only the Self. The world and people in it are shadows moving across the ground of pure being. They appear to exist to those who believe in their own existence. Drop the illustion of individual existence and these questions all become moot. [snip] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 dear suresh, it is due to the ignorance that we take ourselfs to be a body and a doer and enjoyer, if this ignorance is removed we realize we are brahman and have always been brahman. until then all sadhana is recommended, yes sadhana is a product of the world of duality, in and as brahman there is no such thing as sadhana, whom would worship who? yours truly...jaya --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.349 / Virus Database: 195 - Release 15/04/2002 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2002 Report Share Posted April 19, 2002 > > >I agree about the mental gymnastics we are all going >thru. > >What are the tangibles that have to experienced first >hand? > >JOEDEV Joe Dev Notions of tagible and intangibles, 'going thou' and 'not going thru' and first hand experience - are not all of them under the same broad classification of mental gymnastics. It is not having them or not having them but being aware of all the mental gymnastics is the very solution to the problem - otherwise we will be jumping form one gymnastics to the other thinking that that gymnastics better than this one - golden shakels vs iron ones. - Is it not! Fist hand experince - is it not another gymnastics - who is going to be judge of that - other than oneself which is already witness of these gymnastics too. Then what is there other than first hand experience! - Knowledge is recognzing that I am that experiencer in all these gymnastic experiences - is not the truth? Hari OM! Sadananda _______________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.