Guest guest Posted January 26, 2000 Report Share Posted January 26, 2000 Greetings Frank, Anand Frank wrote: the upanishadic idea of brahman being attributeless is the same as its definition in the Cabala as Ain Soph; as in the Tao that cannot be named; as in the Zen no-mind; as in the Toltec shaman Nagual. their purpose is strategic: to release the ego-mind from its pet attachents [to philosophic notions]. Yes indeed, Frank. I think perhaps the only difference between us is one of emphasis. I am a rationalist and not a mystic so I persist in maintaining that Advaita actually does make rational sense (despite the protestations to contrary of some of its most illustrious exponents!) Regards, Patrick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.