Guest guest Posted April 22, 2000 Report Share Posted April 22, 2000 Swami Dhayanandaji's Gita Home-study Discussion Notes on Karma Yoga - Part V KARMA-YOGA REQUIRES THE RECOGNITION OF 1SVARA Samatva as yoga, on the other hand, requires one more aspect: 1svara. Once we say the result of one's action is not within our control, and that it is taken care of, the question becomes, what is it that takes care of it? All results are taken care of by certain laws, the body of which we call either the law of dharma or the law of karma. In fact, it is a law of karma. Other than the physical laws that we know and do not know, there does seem to be another order of law. We are always finding orders within orders. For example, when you lift your hand, physical laws are naturally at work, but there are also many other laws involved. Lifting the hand involves will. You have a thought and up it goes! There is nothing physical about this aspect of lifting your hand. You need not push any button. Thus, although we find that this physical body, this anatomical structure, is standing on this earth according to physical law, it is born onto this earth by certain biological as well as physical laws. There are also physiological and psychological laws. We find, then, that there are laws within laws within laws so that when I perform a simple karma, even my past karmas may infringe upon the result that I want from this particular action. We really do not know if this happens or not. Because we find ourselves lucky or not very lucky, we appreciate that there is some law at work. Whatever is the law that governs the karma and its result is the law of karma and that law of karma includes various other laws also. No law is created by me. I am not the author of any law. If I were, I would not be helpless. I would always be able to accomplish whatever I wanted. There would be no problem. I could even reorganize the law to suit myself. I would not even need to cover the distance to reach a certain place; the place would come to me. Or, I could think about being in a certain place and I would be there immediately. But this is not the case. Therefore, we try to go by the laws and, at the same time, we do not know very much about them. RECOGNIZING THE AUTHOR OF THE LAWS As one who knows very little, I can only go by the known laws and know that the laws are not authored by me. Then the question may arise, who authored them? Certainly not my grandfather. He and his father and grandfathers before him were themselves all born of these laws. They existed because of the laws and they-left the planet because of the same laws. The laws that bring people into being also take care of them and, then, take care of them for good! You find these- laws always operating and no given person can be considered to be the author of them. To recognize the author, then, is to take one more step. You must first recognize that the author of the laws produces the results of action and that the laws themselves are not the producer of the result of action. When you go one step further and recognize the author as 1~vara, the Lord, you have the beginnings of karma-yoga. There are still more steps to go, but this, at least, is the beginning: the creation is not created by me. Therefore, whoever did create it is 1~vara and this same Isvara is the producer of the results of action. When you receive money from someone, month after month, the postman is the one who actually gives you the money. But this does not mean that the postman is a benevolent person who goes about distributing money to everyone like Santa Claus. There is someone other than the postman who is to be thanked. Similarly, the karma-phala, the result, is produced by the law and the law itself is produced by another intelligent being. That all-intelligent being, Brahman, is called 1tvara, the Lord, with reference to the creation: He is the Overlord, in fact, the top inan, the boss, not limited by time, space, or anything. THE NATURE OF THE AUTHOR The Veda comes in here to address the question of the author and his creation. >From that Brahman alone, the five elements are born; therefore, with reference to the creation, that Brahman is considered paramesvara. Not only is He paramesvara, the author, the maker of the creation (nimitta-karana), He is also the material. This is another important point. Because the world (jagat) is mithyaa, having no independent existence apart from Brahman, it requires only a Mithyaa cause, called mAyA. MAyA, also being mithyA, has no independent existence apart from satya (Brahman), whereas satya does not depend upon anything for its existence. In the mAyA, there is satya. Being mithyA, the jagat is also satya and so are we. It is not that originally there was Brahman and now we have to cross over everything to reach that Brahman. Everything is Brahman. Wherever there is MithyA, there is satya and that satya is the basis (adhisthAna) for everything. Therefore, that paramesvara Himself, who is para-brahma and who is the cause of the creation (nimitta-kaarana). who is omniscient (sarvajna) and omnipotent (sarvasaktimaan) is also the material cause of the creation (upadaana-kaarana). Thus, He is not only the maker of the results of action, but also the very law, the very result of action, in fact. Because our topic is karma-yoga, we will not go beyond this point here since, to do so, becomes jnana. We say, then, that 1svara is the maker of the laws and, also, that the laws are not separate from Him. The results of action, coming as they do from the laws that are not separate from 1svara, the Lord, come from Isvara. It is this recognition of Isvara that is karma-yoga. Without Isvara, what we have been discussing is nothing more than a pragmatic approach to life. But, here, we are dealing with a purely religious approach, which is entirely different because it recognizes Isvara, the Lord, as the giver of the results of action (karma-phala-daataa) and oneself as only the doer of action (karmakartaa). To be a karma-yogi, one has to accept Isvara. Isvara now has one more definition: all-knowledge (sarvajnana). And when we say sarvasaktiman, we mean that he is all-powerful and has all skills, being the creator of everything. Another defining word we have seen is karma-phala-daataa, the giver of the fruits of action. These definitions eliminate the problems that arise when it is said that God created all beings. I may naturally ask why God created one person blind and another lame. If I am told that, being God, He is justified to do whatever He likes and that I should not question Him, I will definitely ask why God's creation is even talked about since it is obviously nothing to boast about-especially when I am also told that He is all-compassion! I am asked to worship and love Him, but when I look at this creation with so much human suffering, God's compassion falls apart for me. Then I am told that He is justified in whatever He does and I am supposed to love Him. How can I? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.