Guest guest Posted April 26, 2000 Report Share Posted April 26, 2000 ============================================================= This article is emailed to you by Ram Chandran ( chandran ) ============================================================= Source: The Hindu (http://www.the-hindu.com) Realisation, state of absolute silence CHENNAI, APRIL 27. The philosophy of the Vedas is distilled in the Upanishads and the term ``Vedanta'' is used generally to refer to them. The name is also appropriate as the Upanishads are found towards the concluding portion of the Vedas. The subject of discussion in them being the Ultimate Reality, the entire exercise is aimed at teaching the spiritual aspirant that the Supreme Being is not the object to be known as in the study of other secular disciplines but that it is the subject (Self) itself. Thus study of Vedanta is not an intellectual pursuit but one in which the objective is a matter of experience. The truth has to be experienced for oneself. The spiritual teacher (Guru) is not a teacher in the conventional sense but one who by his grace dispels the disciple's ignorance. The Guru need not come in person to guide his disciple. Ramana Maharishi, for instance, referred to Arunachala as his Guru and father. He has taught in his work Aksharamanamalai that the true Guru is within, the Self (Atman). In the process of Self-enquiry which the sage advocated, it is the Self which is the Guru. The Guru can appear externally also in the form of a person and guide the aspirant on the spiritual path. In his discourse, Sri T. N. Pranatharthiharan said that the greatest of the Gurus was one who taught the truth in silence. This is due to the fact that Self-realisation is a unitive experience and hence there is no room for speech. This silence must not be mistaken for verbal non- communication. It is at a more fundamental level where there is no thought. So when the truth is grasped there can be only silence and it can be communicated only in silence. The sage used to quote an episode from the text Yoga Vasishta to explain this apparent paradox. When Rama visited Sage Atri's hermitage during His exile in the forest, the sage was overjoyed with Sita's exemplary conduct and character but he wanted to test Her all the same. When Rama was away, with his spiritual power, Atri made a person similar to Him appear before Sita but She nodded Her head indicating that he was not Rama. This happened again and finally when Rama returned She remained silent indicating thereby that there was no need for action or words to show that He was indeed Rama. Saint Tayumanavar also refers to the state of absolute silence - when the mind is free from thoughts - as the one beyond that of speech, body and mind. Ramana never disapproved of any spiritual path but only showed how all must lead to the same path eventually - the path of Self- enquiry which can be described as the royal path to liberation. Copyrights: 2000 The Hindu & Tribeca Internet Initiatives Inc. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the consent of The Hindu & Tribeca Internet Initiatives Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2000 Report Share Posted April 27, 2000 Harih Om: It is very easy for any to misunderstand Ramana Maharishi's statement, that "The True Guru is within, the Self (Atman)" and conclude that we don't need external Gurus. When we reach the spiritual development to the level of the Maharishi, we don't need external influence. No external guidance will be necessary and sufficient at that time. One has to look internally for guidance. External guidances can be sometime direct and othertimes subtle. Many of us get the guidance by looking at a sage or a saint and also by thinking. Maharishi's reference to Arunachal as the Guru is quite profound! At the first sight of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, he became Swami Vivekananda's Guru. True Guru is the flash of an inspiration revealed internally. We can never satisfactorily answer the question, 'who is responsible for inspiration?' However, there can be no inspiration without any perspiration! It is also true that perspiration alone will not gurantee inspiration!! regards, Ram Chandran --- thehindu wrote: > ============================================================= > This article is emailed to you by Ram Chandran ( > chandran ) > ============================================================= > Source: The Hindu (http://www.the-hindu.com) > > Realisation, state of absolute silence > >........................ > The Guru need not come in person to guide his > disciple. Ramana > Maharishi, for instance, referred to Arunachala as > his Guru and > father. He has taught in his work Aksharamanamalai > that the true > Guru is within, the Self (Atman). In the process of > Self-enquiry > which the sage advocated, it is the Self which is > the Guru. The > Guru can appear externally also in the form of a > person and guide > the aspirant on the spiritual path. > ................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.