Guest guest Posted June 28, 2000 Report Share Posted June 28, 2000 namaste. Over the past weekend, in our local advaita group, we looked at shri dakshiNAmurthy stotra of shri shankara. In the lively discussion that followed, one of the questions that was brought up was: "Does the jeeva and brahman simultaneously exist (or co-exist)?" The people who supported the affirmative (including the discussion leader) have the following argument: Brahman always exists. When the jeeva has intellectual knowledge of brahman, the jeeva is aware that he/she is jeeva, but also knew that the substratum is brahman. Hence the jeeva and brahman simultaneously exit (co-exist). The arguments contrary to the statement above (including by yours truly) are the following: 1. Jeeva and brahman cannot and do not simultaneously exist. (a) If you say you are brahman, then you are not a jeeva (the individuality is no longer there). (b) If you say you are a jeeva, then you have no knowledge (experiential) of brahman. However many intellectual arguments one makes, they do not cut, because you still have not lost your individuality, hence you are not aware you are brahman. 2. Jeeva is an adhyasa (superimposition) on brahman. If the veil of mAyA is removed, then jeeva no longer exists and brahman only remains. 3. Similar to the rope-snake analogy: if we know the rope to be the rope, snake does not exist. If we are under the mistaken impression that it is a snake, the rope does not exist. Thus the super- -imposed and the substratum cannot simultaneously exist in our awareness. Any additional comments on the topic? Regards Gummuluru Murthy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.