Guest guest Posted July 18, 2000 Report Share Posted July 18, 2000 Errors ! Corrections !! Dear List Members, There are a few mistakes in my postings so far. Please correct them : 1. the following line in posting no. 3 has a wrong spelling : This is not an invention by my imagination. See [RV I - 164 - 45] tri.nii the last word should be trii.ni 2. I have written a sentence in posting no. 5 upside-down : (approx. line no. 117) "Whenever there is fire there is smoke" which is logically wrong, of course. I wanted to write : "Whenever there is smoke there is fire." 3. Apart from these there may be spelling mistakes which escaped my attention. My ra"smaya.h (thinking, fingers, computer keyboard keys) are not what they used to be :-( Thanks. -- Himanshu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2000 Report Share Posted July 20, 2000 On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, H.B.Dave wrote: > [...] > > Dear List Members, > We have completed here introductory part of this series. Now we shall take > up specific suktas/mantras which indicate seeds of various streams of > thoughts about different approaches to the One, but before that I would like > to have feed-back from you : > (i) Are the ideas generally expressed clearly enough? > (ii) Is there anything about which you have serious objection? > (iii) Is the style of presentation, which is tutorial style, conductive for > the topics? > (iv) Do you feel that some more back-ground information should have been > provided? > (v) Does the series of postings help you in some way? Should it be > continued? > > I shall appreciate your response on any of these points and wait for some > response before continuing. > > .o bhadra.m no apivaataya mana.h | > > > With best wishes to all. > -- Himanshu > namaste. My apologies for this late response. I find the series presented very well and I would like them to be continued in the same style. I find the material presented to be quite a lot at one stretch. I would prefer the articles to be not more than two screen-fulls and I would prefer a gap of at least a week before the next article appears so that people have time to read, think and digest the article. I still havn't read fully all the articles in this thread, but hope to be getting to that stage soon. The background material is adequate. I would like to see specific reference to which vedic text is discussed. I thank shri Dave for taking time to present these articles and I hope he would continue to post on this and other aspects of the vedas. Regards Gummuluru Murthy --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2000 Report Share Posted July 21, 2000 Gummuluru Murthy wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, H.B.Dave wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > Dear List Members, > > We have completed here introductory part of this series. Now we shall take > . > > -- Himanshu > > > > namaste. > > My apologies for this late response. I find the series presented > very well and I would like them to be continued in the same style. > I find the material presented to be quite a lot at one stretch. > I would prefer the articles to be not more than two screen-fulls Though I do understand your difficulty, I have to complete a thought sequence, i.e. asub-topic otherwise it is very difficult to convey abstract ideas. The material is NOT to be read in one sitting, you may have to re-read it several times and think about it. Also, there a structure in the postings, by which I have tried to create an ambiance approximating a talk in person. I hope you will bear with me and give sufficient time to the material presented. I am sure you will not regrete it. > > and I would prefer a gap of at least a week before the next article > appears so that people have time to read, think and digest the > article. Yes, you will find that frequency of postings are almost as you have suggested. > I still havn't read fully all the articles in this thread, > but hope to be getting to that stage soon. The background material > is adequate. I would like to see specific reference to which vedic > text is discussed. > > I thank shri Dave for taking time to present these articles and > I hope he would continue to post on this and other aspects of the > vedas. > > Regards > Gummuluru Murthy Thanks for comments. It helps. Best wishes, -- Himanshu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.