Guest guest Posted October 19, 2000 Report Share Posted October 19, 2000 >From "Swami Vivekananda: A Reassessment" by Narasingha P. Sil: Sadly enough the restless Hindu missionary fell victim to his naiveté and nonchalance in respect to women. Vivekananda's monastic training repudiated woman as a sexual being while elevating her of the status of a dehumanized deity or a de-erotized mother and sister. With little experience of the world of man and woman, the Swami confronted a severe emotional crisis arising from his relationship with his Anglo-Irish disciple Margaret Noble. . . his contact with Miss Noble in particular, brought about a profound psychic revolution at a time when he was troubled by his terminal illness. . . His dual struggle against failing health and crumbling monastic indifference to kamini-kancana contributed to a sense of utter nothingness and extinction. . . He died a totally frustrated sannyasi, disavowing his much vaunted conviction in the success of his exertions. . . and, contrary to his reputation for militant activism, he recoiled in mystical isolationism and quiescence toward the end of his short life. While it cannot be doubted that Vivekananda was a great saint, it is equally doubtless that he was a human being as well. Almost as famous for his hyperbole as he was for his spirituality, he was often prone to making grand and sweeping statements, and equally prone to changing his mind. His brother discipline Saradananda complained to him such: "Sometimes you say that there is no God, and now you are saying [there is]. You really are not consistent in what you say because you often change your mind." In short, while Jay may have full faith in the words of his namesake, those words don't necessarily hold as some sort of absolute truth, one that must be rigidly adhered to in order for one to be blessed with success on the spiritual path. --jody. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digger Posted May 29, 2013 Report Share Posted May 29, 2013 Jody is right on the mark. Yes, I, author of Swami Vivekananda: A Reassessment (1997), did intend to bring out the authentic humanity of the much celebrated Hindu religious prophet. Please re-read my Preface and Conclusion. My final sentence in the study reads: "Swami Vivekananda emerges from a century-old gilded cage of myth and mystification not as the herald of a brave new world of spiritualism but as a tragic figure whose brief but tumultuous public life was spent contending with multiple tensions and conflicts--much less attractive but probably more authentic, and eminently human." This is not denigration of the person but a historian's assessment of his odyssey. Thank you. digger May 28, 2013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.