Guest guest Posted January 2, 1996 Report Share Posted January 2, 1996 Dear Sadananda, Your answer to Robin's question Re Devotion is one of the most beatiful posts I've read for a long time. I liked it very much when you wrote "true devotion is not emotional - it is actually intellectual". And also: "Just stand back and enjoy the tamaashha or entertainment - you cannot but marvel at His incredible play - just stand apart and enjoy - that is devotion." Very beautifully expressed. However, I've never considered myself a bhakti type, not even when I was still a Christian. I tend to consider bhakti to be a mental attitude based on dualism: you are a devotee of a divinity only insofar as you feel yourself to be separated from That and longing for unity with IT. But once you accept that you are nothing other that That, what place is there left for bhakti? If there is only Consciousness, if you as an individual entity are just imaginary, if the only reality in you is That, then there is no separation and no place for a relation of devotion between an imaginaty you and That. And yet I liked what you wrote. Because you stress the part of intellectual understanding in devotion. I think that everything boils down to understanding, to clearly seeing the true nature of things. If you have that, you have everything, you lack nothing, even if you are not enlightened. Am I wrong? Miguel Angel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.