Guest guest Posted December 12, 2000 Report Share Posted December 12, 2000 To the moderaters, In the 4th chapter , a discussion about karma vikarma akarma is given can a short comment be made regarding these definitions? since there is an apparent contradiction between the meaning we understand and the implied meaning geetacharya describe. Mirmala Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2000 Report Share Posted December 12, 2000 Namaste, Gita : 4:17 - karmaNaH api boddhavyaM boddhavya.n cha vikarmaNaH . akarmaNaH cha boddhavya.n gahanaa karmaNaH gatiH .. " For verily (the true nature) of "right action" should be known; also (that) of "forbidden (or unlawful) action" and of "inaction" ; imponderable is the nature (path) of action." Sw. Chinmayananda The meanings would seem to be: vachyaartha lakshyaartha [varies with commentator] karma = any action action in accordance with dharma vikarma = forbidden action action opposed to dharma [vipariita karma] akarma = non-action, inaction abandonment of action, as a privilege of renunciates or sanyasa. naishhkarmya = actions without the element of egoism Only Vinoba Bhave interpreted vikarma as 'visheshha karma', the actions that purify the mind. Even Tilak, the foremost proponent of Action as the essence of Gita, translates vikarma as vipariita karma. Gita's synthesis is in nishhkaama karma, [in Gandhi's words anaasakti yoga], and naishhkarmya-siddhi, perfection in non-egoistic action]. The debate on the definition of these terms is not likely to be conclusive on the intellectual plane! As repeatedly taught by the sages, the Gita is interpreted according to the 'adhikara' or competence of the individual. The destination is the same for all, and the first four verses of Ramana Maharshi's Upadesha Sara is a good summary to refer to. Regards, s. advaitin , slimaye@a... wrote: > > To the moderaters, > In the 4th chapter , a discussion about karma vikarma akarma is given can a > short comment be made regarding these definitions? since there is an apparent > contradiction between the meaning we understand and the implied meaning > geetacharya describe. > Mirmala Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.