Guest guest Posted December 22, 2000 Report Share Posted December 22, 2000 Harih Aum: It is my pleasure to introduce Professor Balaji Hebbar of George Washington University, Washington, DC to the list. Sri Balaji has been teaching several philosophical courses at George Washington University, University of Maryland and also privately to interested individual groups. Yesterday, I met him at Nataraj Bookstore where he came to order books for the spring semester. Sri Balaji is very knowledgeable and well versed in Indian Philosophical systems and has indicated that he will participate in the on going discussions Brahma Suutra and Gita Satsang. We can all look forward to his active participation and thoughtful articles and discussion. warmest regards, Ram Chandran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2000 Report Share Posted December 22, 2000 Dear Friends: I thank shrImati and shrI Ram Chandran for inviting me and putting me on the list. I'm no great scholar as shrI Ram Chandran makes me out to be. I'm just someone who has managed to pick things here and there from the really learned folks. My emphasis in this series of electronic articles will be to show the richness of classical Indian thought (Hindu, Jaina & Bauddha) as a whole by showing these systems in a comparative light on a given topic, and not just the views of one system to the exclusion of all else. It is important to do this as the systems grew up together and "influenced" each other. With this brief introduction, here's the first topic. Classical Indian Philosophy constitutes three major religio-philosophical trains of thought: 1. Hindu 2. Jaina 3. Buddhist The Hindu Philosophical systems are: 1. the haituka darshanas, i.e. those systems that make only a provisional acceptance of Vedic Authority. a) nyAya-VaisheShika b) SAmkhya-Yoga 2. the shrotriya darshanas, i.e. those systems that make a total acceptance of Vedic Authority. a) MImAmsA -school of PrabhAkara Mishra -school of KumArila BhaTTa b) VedAnta -school of AcArya shankara (advaita) -school of AcArya rAmAnuja (VishiShTAdvaita) -school of AcArya Madhva (dvaita) -school of AcArya nimbArka (svAbhAvikadvaitAdvaita) -school of AcArya Vallabha (shuddhAdvaita) -school of AcArya Caitanya (AcintyadvaitAdvaita) Of the VeAntic schools, the first three are the most important. Every system of thought has expressed its views on the following areas which then make it a complete scheme of thought. 1. PramAna vicAra (Epistemology) 2. tattva vicAra (Ontology) 3. Isvara vicAra (Theology) 4. Jagat VicAra (Cosmology) 5. JIva VicAra (Psychology) 6. Moksa VicAra (Soteriology) EPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES 1. Sources of Knowledge 2. Nature of Knowledge 3. Validity of Knowledge SOURCES of Knowledge: 1. Jainism: accepts 3: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), Teachings of the 24 Jinas (JinashAsana) 2. Buddhism: accepts 3: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), Teachings of the Buddha (Buddhavacana) 3. nyAya-Vaisesika: accepts 4: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), analogy (upamAna), Vedas. 4. SAmkhya-Yoga: accepts 3: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), Vedas. 5. PrabhAkara MimAmsA: accepts 5: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), analogy (upamAna), implication (arthApatti), Vedas. 6. KumArila MimAmsA: accepts 6: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), analogy (upamAna), implication (arthApatti), non-apprehension (anupalabdhi), Vedas. 7. shankara (advaita) VedAnta: accepts the same 6 as KumArila's system. (vyAvahAre bhATTa nayah) 8. rAmAnuja (VisistAdvaita) VedAnta: accepts 3: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), Vedas+4000 ALvAr Prabandhams (hence called ubhaya VedAnta) 9. Madhva (dvaita) VedAnta: accepts 3: perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumAna), Vedas. kindest regards B.N.Hebbar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2000 Report Share Posted December 22, 2000 It is nice of you, shri Ram Chandran- for having introduced Prof. Balaji to the List. We look forward to his contributions. Warm welcome to you, Praofessor Balaji. Hari Om! Swaminarayan -- Ram Chandran <rchandran wrote: > Harih Aum: > > It is my pleasure to introduce Professor Balaji > Hebbar of George Washington > University, Washington, DC to the list. Sri Balaji > has been teaching several > philosophical courses at George Washington > University, University of Maryland > and also privately to interested individual groups. > Yesterday, I met him at > Nataraj Bookstore where he came to order books for > the spring semester. Sri > Balaji is very knowledgeable and well versed in > Indian Philosophical systems > and has indicated that he will participate in the on > going discussions Brahma > Suutra and Gita Satsang. We can all look forward to > his active participation > and thoughtful articles and discussion. > > warmest regards, > > Ram Chandran > Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2000 Report Share Posted December 22, 2000 advaitin , Shree Balaji Hebbar <bhebbar@e...> wrote: > Dear Friends: > > I thank shrImati and shrI Ram Chandran for inviting me > kindest regards > B.N.Hebbar Dear Shree Balaji Hebbar, We are fortunate and are honored, Sir, for this kind opportunity of your esteemd participation. Our warmest welcome, kind Sir. I have made a chart to understand Shree Balaji's notes. I thought I will present it here. Hindu Philosophical systems:- - Jaina - Buddhist - Hindu -- haituka darshanas --- nyAya-VaisheShika --- SAmkhya-Yoga -- shrotriya darshanas --- MImAmsA ---- school of PrabhAkara Mishra ---- school of KumArila BhaTTa --- VedAnta ---- school of AcArya shankara (advaita) ---- school of AcArya rAmAnuja (VishiShTAdvaita) ---- school of AcArya Madhva (dvaita) ---- school of AcArya nimbArka (svAbhAvikadvaitAdvaita) ---- school of AcArya Vallabha (shuddhAdvaita) ---- school of AcArya Caitanya (AcintyadvaitAdvaita) I have a question. Upanishadic and Vedic perspectives which were in day-to-day use for a long time in history before most of the above schools, themselves do not seem to have been categorised in the above. If that is true, where do they fit in ? With Warmest Regards and Welcoming Shree Balaji once again, Raghava Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2000 Report Share Posted December 23, 2000 Dear shrI Raghava: The History of Indian Philosophy may be classified into three major periods. 1. the Vedic Period (from XXX to 500 BCE) 2. the Heterodox Period (from 500 BCE to 500 CE) Period when many anti-Vedic movements took birth of which only two survived, i.e. Jainism and Buddhism. 3. the Orthodox Period (from 100-1500 CE) Period of the Classical Hindu philosophical systems. BCE=Before the Common Era=BC CE=Common Era=AD The history of Indian Philosophy seems to have followed a Hegelian model of history, i.e. thesis (Vedic Period), anti-thesis (Heterodox Period) and synthesis (Orthodox Period). The Vedas including the upaniShads come under the first period. This is when great upaniShadic philosophers like YAjn~avalkya, uddAlaka etc. flourished fearlessly expressing their views and spiritual experiences. kindest regards B.N.Hebbar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.