Guest guest Posted January 10, 2001 Report Share Posted January 10, 2001 namaste. We are discussing in the past few weeks karma, action in the context of bhagavadgItA chapters 4 and 5. Shri Anand Natarajan's posting of Vinobha Bhave's commentary and shri Ram Chandran's postings of Tilak's commentary (as presented in Ranade's book) and also Gandhiji's views on the gItA are excellent additions. Antoine Carre's queries on this are very much in context as well. shri shankara steadfastly refused to recognize karma as leading to jnAna and SELF-realization. His views are very authoritative and unbending in this. He stated karma and avidyA are not opposites and by doing karma, you cannot get rid of avidyA. The bhagavtpAda stated this emphatically in vivekacUDAmaNi, upadeshasahasrI and in bhAshyA-s to various upanishads, brahmasUtrA-s and to bhagavadgItA. Swami Atmananda (not the swamiji of the Indore maTha, but an earlier one by the same title) compiled shri shankara's sayings in a book form "sankara's teachings in his own words". Taking this book as the source, I give below shri shankara's views on karma vis-a-vis SELF-realization. Karma, of course, plays a major part in pUrva mImAMsa of Jaimini and I will start this essay stating the role of karma in the understanding of pUrva mImAMsic view and then present shri shankara's views on karma from various bhAShyA-s. pUrva mImAMsa view of karma and Jaimini's prescription for moksha -------------------------------- The vedic karmA-s have been divided into four categories: nitya, naimittika, kAmya and pratishiddha. Nitya karmA-s have been ordained to be performed every day as long as life lasts. snAnaM, sandhyA japo homo devatAnAmca pUjanam.h AtithyaM vaisvadevaM ca ShaTkarmANi dine dine bath (which is common to all and does not count), sandhyA, japam, homam, daivapUja, Atithyam, vaisvadevam are the six nitya karmA-s. The vedas do not make mention of any phala (fruit) for the nitya karmA-s. So, they cannot have any fruit. Yet, as they are an imperative command of the vedA-s, they cannot be given up. If they are given up, it becomes an offense against the mandate of the vedA-s and will entail pratyavaya (serious evil consequence). Thus, the three essential features of the nitya karmA-s are: (i) they are to be compulsively performed daily, (ii) they do not confer any fruit as kAmya karmA-s do, (iii) thier non-performance will entail pratyavaya. (As will be shown later, shri shankara repudiates all these three features of nitya karma). Naimittika karmA-s are sacrifices to be performed on special occasions like the Full Moon, New Moon, eclipses etc. KAmya karmA-s are sacrifices to be performed to achieve special desires like the the birth of a son, for a good harvest etc. Pratishiddha karmA-s are prohibited actions, the performance of which will produce evil, say hell or birth as animals, etc. Thus, in pUrva mImAMsa, the chart is clear to attain moksha: do nitya karmA-s without fail, do not perform kAmya karmA-s and do not do pratishiddha karmA-s. In the next post, shri shankara's refutations of the mImAMsic concepts will be presented. (continued) Regards Gummuluru Murthy ------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2001 Report Share Posted January 10, 2001 Namaskar, Murthygaru's point of view regarding 'karma' is quite correct and readers should understand the distinction between the two terminologies: 'karma' and 'karma yoga.' The attitude of the karma yogi is to renounce the doership without abandoning the work. The attitude of the karmi is that he/she assumes that he/she is the doer! Karmi's avidya (due to delusion) is responsible for this attitude. When the karmi dispels his/her delusion, the avidya disappears and the karmi emerges as the karma yogi. It is nice of Murthygaru to expand the discussions to illustrate the complexity and importance of understanding the two terminologies - 'karmi' and 'karma yogi' warmest regards, Ram Chandran advaitin , Gummuluru Murthy <gmurthy@m...> wrote: > > namaste. > ..... > shri shankara steadfastly refused to recognize karma as leading to > jnAna and SELF-realization. His views are very authoritative and > unbending in this. ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.